PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 5961370

Negative capacitance solid state microelectrode input circuit for use in neurophysiology.

S Chamberlain·G A Kerkut·R B Venning
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.

Explore related subjects

NeurophysiologyJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

S Chamberlain, G A Kerkut, R B Venning. 1966. Negative capacitance solid state microelectrode input circuit for use in neurophysiology.. https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-3205(66)90214-1

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed1985

An inexpensive digital tape recorder suitable for neurophysiological signals.

Modifications are described which convert an inexpensive 'Digital Audio Processor' (Sony PCM-701ES), together with a video cassette recorder, into a high performance digital tape recorder, with two analog channels of 16 bit resolution and DC-20 kHz bandwidth. A further modification is described which optionally provides four additional 1-bit digital channels by sacrificing the least significant four bits of one analog channel. If required two additional high quality analog channels may be obtained by use of one of the new video cassette recorders (such as the Sony SL-HF100) which incorporate a pair of FM tracks.

Neurophysiology↗
PubMed1983

The interpretation of significance tests for independent and dependent samples.

The assumptions upon which a correct interpretation of the t-test depends are rarely fulfilled by data from the neurosciences. This applies to both independent and correlated samples. The Mann-Whitney U-test is suggested as an alternative for the t-test for independent samples. The way in which significant results from this test should be interpreted is discussed. The Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-ranks test is not suggested as an alternative for the t-test for correlated samples, since significant results can occur with this test, even when there are no differences between the distributions of the two samples tested. A modification of the U-test for dependent samples is proposed instead. The use of the latter test, and of the U-test, is illustrated by numerical examples from real data.

Neurophysiology↗