PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 604921

A color image hierarchy.

Abstract

There is renewed interest by psychologists in mental imagery. While practical uses of imagery are being rapidly developed, there still remains a great deal to learn about imaging itself. One aspect of imaging is color. A review of the literature provided no research data as to which colors were easiest or hardest to image. Using the method of pair comparisons, an interval scale was devised, indicating the relative ease with which various colors could be imaged. The final scale, from easiest to most difficult to image, was black, red, yellow, blue, green, white, orange and finally purple. Implications for image training are suggested.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J E Switras. 1977. A color image hierarchy.. https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1977.45.3f.1337

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Readability and sensitivity of a new faecal occult blood test in a hospital ward environment. Comparison with an established test.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the readability and sensitivity of a new guaiac faecal occult blood test, HemoccultSENSA, with those of a standard guaiac-based test, Hemoccult, in a normal working environment. DESIGN: The two tests were performed in parallel on routine clinical and contrived faecal specimens; those developing the tests were blinded as to the test type. SETTING: All tests were carried out in the hospital ward environment under normal conditions by nurses working in the ward. SAMPLES: Fifty faecal samples from healthy volunteer subjects (low concentrations of haemoglobin were added to 40 of these samples) and 145 faecal samples from 65 inpatients likely to have gastrointestinal bleeding. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Test positivity rate, and graded measures of colour intensity, colour stability and colour pattern. RESULTS: With patients' samples, the new test gave a greater number of positive results than the standard test (73.1% v. 65.5%; 95% confidence interval of the difference, 3.3%-11.9%). With contrived samples, the blue colour produced during development was more intense (P less than 0.0003), more stable (P less than 0.0025) and covered a larger area (P less than 0.01) with the new test compared with the standard test. CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate the better readability and slightly higher sensitivity of the new test. They justify its use in the ward environment or doctor's office. Patients being tested should consume a low peroxidase diet until the specificity of the new test has been fully evaluated.

Color