PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 606833

Cutting work in thick section cryomicrotomy.

Abstract

The forces during cryosectioning were measured using miniature strain gauges attached to a load cell fitted to the drive arm of the Porter-Blum MT-2 cryomicrotome. Work was calculated and the data normalized to a standard (1 mm X 1 mm X 0.5 micrometer) section. Thermal energy generated was also calculated. Five parameters were studied: cutting angle, thickness, temperature, hardness, and block shape. Force patterns could be divided into three major groups thought to represent cutting (Type I), large fracture planes greater than 10 micrometer in length (Type II), and small fracture planes less than 10 micrometer in length (Type III). Type I and Type II produced satisfactory sections. Work in cutting ranged from an average of 78.4 muJ to 568.8 muJ. Cutting angle and temperature had the greatest effect on sectioning. Heat generated would be sufficient to cause through-section melting for 0.5 micrometer thick sections assuming the worst possible case, namely that all heat went into the section without loss. Presence of a Type II pattern (large fracture pattern) is thought to be presumptive evidence against thawing.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

A J Saubermann, W D Riley, R Beeuwkes. 1977. Cutting work in thick section cryomicrotomy.. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2818.1977.tb00046.x

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Four years experience with teleneuropathology.

Between 2002 and 2005, we made 343 intraoperative frozen section diagnoses with a telepathology system, which connected a neurosurgical department to our department of pathology. An expert neuropathologist performed at least one brief gross examination, and this was followed by a smear preparation and a frozen section slide for each case. Frozen section diagnosis lasted on average 26.1 min, calculated from the beginning of gross examination until the surgeon was given the diagnosis. The majority of cases (283 or 83%) were diagnosed in 15-40 min. The mean time needed for macroscopic examination was 3.0 min, time for staining 4.2 min, smear diagnosis took 5.4 min and time for histological diagnosis 10.7 min. Telemicroscopy of a smear slide took 11 times longer compared with light microscopy, and telemicroscopy of a frozen section slide took 16 times longer than with light microscopy. In 6% of cases, the telepathology software posed technical problems, which delayed the time of diagnosis, but not by more than 4 min. We were able to render a diagnosis in all cases (system reliability 100%). After eliminating sampling errors (i.e. cases with no diagnostic material in the frozen section slides and/or in smear preparations), the diagnostic accuracy for telepathology was 97.9%.

Frozen Sections↗