PubMed · 6079180
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
W S Brownsey, C Fillauer. 1967. Temporary prosthesis with adjustable socket.. https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj%2F47.12.1129
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
When compared with automated contact methods of finite element (FE) analyses, gap elements have certain inherent disadvantages in simulating large slip of compliant materials on stiff surfaces. However, automated contact has found limited use in the biomechanical literature. A non-linear, three-dimensional, geometrically accurate, FE analysis of the trans-tibial limb-socket prosthetic system was used to compare an automated contact interface model with a gap element model, and to evaluate the sensitivity of automated contact to interfacial coefficient of friction (COF). Peak normal stresses and resultant shear stresses were higher in the gap element model than in the automated contact model, while the maximum axial slip was less. Under proximally directed load, compared with automated contact, gap elements predicted larger areas of stress concentration that were located more distally. Gap elements did not predict any relative slip at the distal end, and also transmitted a larger proportion of axial load as shear stress. Both models demonstrated non -linear sensitivity to COF, with larger variation at lower magnitudes of COF. By imposing physical connections between interface surfaces, gap elements distort the interface stress distributions under large slip. Automated contact methods offer an attractive alternative in applications such as prosthetic FE modeling, where the initial position of the limb in the socket is not known, where local geometric features have high design significance, and where large slip occurs under load.
An 11 month old child sustained a deep burn injury to the left knee causing total destruction and sequestration of the knee epiphyses. The ensuing leg length discrepancy with growth was managed by a Van Nes rotationplasty at age four with a good immediate functional result using a below 'knee' prosthesis and the prospect of continuing ambulation as he grows. The surgical options for managing this problem are discussed.
The concept of measuring pressure at the interface between the stump and the prosthetic socket could provide valuable information in the process of prosthetic socket fabrication, modification, and fit. Two systems, the Rincoe Socket Fitting System (SFS) and Tekscan's F-Socket Pressure Measurement System, have been commercially designed for in situ interface pressure measurement over the past decade. Their use is not common in prosthetic practice, perhaps due to questions of cost effectiveness and the difficulties of interpreting the data. Another concern is the use of sensors for pressure measurements in areas of high contour and complex geometries such as the stump. Before these systems can be used in a clinical setting, it is necessary to determine the reliability and accuracy of each system. In order to assess the clinical validity of the Rincoe SFS and F-Socket systems, a series of trials was conducted to evaluate different aspects of sensor performance, namely; accuracy, hysteresis, drift and the effect of curvature. The sensors were subjected to tests in flatbed and custom-designed pressure vessels. Overall results indicated an accuracy error for the Rincoe SFS system of 25% (flatbed) and 33% (mould), with a corresponding 15% (flatbed) and 23% (mould) error in hysteresis, and 7% (flatbed) and 11% (mould) drift errors. The F-Socket system demonstrated an 8% (flatbed) and 11% (mould) accuracy errors, 42% (flatbed) and 24% (mould) hysteresis errors, and 12% (flatbed) and 33% (mould) drift errors. These findings indicate favourable results for the F-Socket Pressure Measurement System compared to the Rincoe Socket Fitting System with respect to its accuracy errors only. Nevertheless, it is the authors' belief that these systems are adequate in indicating areas of high pressure at the stump socket interface for clinical purposes, but both systems should be used with caution.