PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 6122552

Beta-blockers and renal function.

Abstract

alpha-, beta 1- and beta 2-adrenergic receptors in the kidney mediate vasoconstriction, renin secretion and vasodilatation, respectively. Blockade of beta-receptors may therefore be expected to influence renal blood flow and possibly glomerular filtration rate by intrarenal effects as well as by reducing cardiac output and blood pressure. Since the various beta-adrenergic blocking drugs available differ in the degree to which they block beta 2-receptors (cardioselectivity) and also in their intrinsic sympathomimetic activity, they would be expected to have different effects on renal function. The acute administration of beta-blockers usually results in a reduction in effective renal plasma flow and glomerular filtration rate, whether or not the drug is cardioselective or has intrinsic sympathomimetic activity, with the exceptions of nadolol, which has actually increased effective renal plasma flow in some studies and of tolamolol. With chronic oral administration, the non-cardioselective beta-blockers reduced glomerular filtration rate and effective renal plasma flow. The cardioselective drugs do not usually produce significant reductions in glomerular filtration rate or effective renal plasma flow, although small increases in serum urea during treatment do occur. Interestingly, in contrast to findings with intravenous administration, orally administered nadolol produced a slight reduction in glomerular filtration rate in 1 study, so the effect of this agent on renal function under clinical conditions remains uncertain. It seems likely that beta-blockers reduce renal function predominantly by blocking beta 2-receptors in the kidney. To keep area of discussion in perspective, it is important to realise that although there have been isolated reports of serious deterioration in renal function coinciding with beta-blocker treatment, the great majority of reports are of reduction in glomerular filtration rate which are not of clinical significance, even in patients with pre-existing impairment of renal function. The beta-blockers with low lipid solubility-i.e. atenolol, nadolol and sotalol-are not metabolised, and their dose must be reduced in renal failure. Propranolol has active metabolites and its dose must also be reduced slightly in uraemia.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

R Wilkinson. 1982. Beta-blockers and renal function.. https://doi.org/10.2165/00003495-198223030-00002

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Cardiologists' practices compared with practice guidelines: use of beta-blockade after acute myocardial infarction.

OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to measure cardiologists' level of adherence to guidelines for long-term use of beta-adrenergic blocker therapy after acute myocardial infarction. BACKGROUND: Beta-blocker therapy after acute myocardial infarction has been shown to reduce the incidence of reinfarction and associated mortality. To learn about cardiologists' use of this therapy after hospital discharge and their level of adherence to American College of Cardiology guidelines, we analyzed insurance claims from 17 network-model health plans located throughout the United States. METHODS: The study group included 150 cardiologists who had contracts with one of the health plans and their 280 patients who were plan members (excluding Medicare enrollees) and received inpatient treatment for acute myocardial infarction that did not include revascularization during 1992. These patients accounted for 307 separate hospital admissions. Insurance claims were used to measure beta-blocker usage and to identify possible contraindications. RESULTS: Forty-three percent of the cases (131 of 307) involved apparent deviations from the guidelines: 11% of cases (35 of 307) involved possible errors of commission (beta-blocker given in the presence of a contraindication) and 31% (96 of 307) errors of omission (beta-blocker not given in the absence of a contraindication). Of the 185 patients who were eligible for the therapy (no contraindications), only 48% (89 of 185) were treated. CONCLUSIONS: Cardiologists currently exhibit a low level of compliance with their specialty's guidelines for postinfarction beta-blockade. Slightly fewer than 50% of the study patients who were eligible for treatment actually received a beta-blocker after hospital discharge. This result, combined with the drug's known level of effectiveness in preventing recurrent myocardial infarction, suggests that increased use could avert approximately 1,900 deaths annually nationwide.

Adrenergic beta-Antagonists