PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 6150780

Barrier contraception.

A Mills
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Barrier contraception is a safe, effective, reversible form of contraception acceptable to many couples. The use of barrier contraception may protect against carcinoma of the cervix and sexually transmitted diseases. Distribution and education in the use of barrier contraception does not always require medical supervision. This must make it an attractive form of contraception for agencies supporting family planning programmes in developing countries. The only marketed recent advance in barrier contraception is the collatex sponge. Effectiveness rates range between 9 and 27 pregnancies per 100 woman-years. This is unlikely to make it the first choice of contraception for couples who would find an unintended pregnancy a severe problem, but the sponge will be acceptable to couples who are simply trying to delay a pregnancy. The new surge of interest in barrier contraception could lead to safer more effective forms of contraception being made available to women without medical supervision. This would have many advantages, but could also detract from the ability of family planning clinics to play an important role in preventative medicine for women.

Explore related subjects

Adrenergic beta-AntagonistsContraceptionContraceptive DevicesContraceptive Devices, FemaleContraceptive Devices, MaleFemaleHumansMalePharmaceutical VehiclesSexually Transmitted DiseasesSpermatocidal AgentsUterine Cervical NeoplasmsBarrier MethodsCervical CapCondomContraceptive AgentsContraceptive Agents, FemaleContraceptive MethodsEconomic FactorsFamily PlanningResearch And DevelopmentSpermicidal Contraceptive AgentsTechnologyVaginal Barrier MethodsVaginal DiaphragmVaginal SpongeJournal ArticleReview

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

A Mills. 1984. Barrier contraception.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/6150780/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2007

Bayesian sensitivity analysis for unmeasured confounding in observational studies.

We consider Bayesian sensitivity analysis for unmeasured confounding in observational studies where the association between a binary exposure, binary response, measured confounders and a single binary unmeasured confounder can be formulated using logistic regression models. A model for unmeasured confounding is presented along with a family of prior distributions that model beliefs about a possible unknown unmeasured confounder. Simulation from the posterior distribution is accomplished using Markov chain Monte Carlo. Because the model for unmeasured confounding is not identifiable, standard large-sample theory for Bayesian analysis is not applicable. Consequently, the impact of different choices of prior distributions on the coverage probability of credible intervals is unknown. Using simulations, we investigate the coverage probability when averaged with respect to various distributions over the parameter space. The results indicate that credible intervals will have approximately nominal coverage probability, on average, when the prior distribution used for sensitivity analysis approximates the sampling distribution of model parameters in a hypothetical sequence of observational studies. We motivate the method in a study of the effectiveness of beta blocker therapy for treatment of heart failure.

Adrenergic beta-Antagonists↗
PubMed2007

[Polypharmacy, compliance and non-prescription medication in patients with cardiovascular disease in Germany].

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The expenses of health insurances are continuously raising. With implementation of evidence-based medicine resulting in polypharmacy, compliance is decreasing and patients as well as physicians are facing unintentional drug interactions. Furthermore the arbitrary use of additional drugs apart from prescribed medication has to be considered. The objective of this study was to analyse polypharmacy, compliance and utilisation patterns for non-prescription medications (OTC) in patients with cardiovascular diseases. METHODS: 100 patients with cardiovascular diseases (45 women, 55 men, 58 - 87 years) were interviewed using a questionnaire. The compliance was determined by the Morisky-Score. RESULTS: 78 % of the patients received more than four pills every day (median 8.34). Most common products were beta-blockers (89 %), ACE-Inhibitors/Sartans (69 %) and aspirin (65 %). Only 52 % of the patients knew the indications of their medication. Although 83 % of the patients claimed to be absolutely compliant concerning their medication, the Morisky-Score revealed a high compliance only in 52 %. The compliance decreased significantly if the number of prescribed medication increased to more than four pills a day. 48 % of the patients took regularly non-prescription products, 35 % more than three additional products daily. Most commonly multivitamins, minerals, herbals and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs were used. This non-prescription medication did not affect the compliance of the patients. CONCLUSIONS: Polypharmacy with more than four pills daily leads to a lower compliance and can therefore influence the implementation of guideline-medicine. Non-prescription medication is widely used and should be considered because of their potential side-effects and drug interactions.

Adrenergic beta-Antagonists↗
PubMed2007

Propranolol blocks chronic risperidone treatment-induced enhancement of spatial working memory performance of rats in a delayed matching-to-place water maze task.

RATIONALE: Atypical antipsychotics improve cognitive function, including working memory, in schizophrenia. Some atypical antipsychotics have been reported to activate the locus coeruleus and induce beta-adrenoceptor antagonist sensitive c-Fos-like immunoreactivity in the prefrontal cortex. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The present study investigated the effects of chronic treatment of rats with risperidone (1 mg kg(-1) day(-1) s.c.), clozapine (10 mg kg(-1) day(-1) s.c.), or acidified saline vehicle control for 2, 4, or 8 weeks on spatial working memory performance in a delayed matching-to-place water maze task with a 60-s inter-trial retention interval with and without acute challenge with propranolol (10 mg/kg i.p.). RESULTS: Treatment with risperidone for 8 weeks, but not 2 or 4 weeks, significantly improved working memory performance. In contrast, treatment with clozapine for up to 8 weeks did not improve working memory. Acute challenge with propranolol blocked the improvement in working memory produced by chronic treatment with risperidone, but had no significant effect on performance in saline- or clozapine-treated animals. CONCLUSIONS: The delayed matching-to-place water maze task may prove valuable in the investigation of the behavioural pharmacology of the cognitive effects of antipsychotic drugs. These data suggest that beta adrenoceptors may contribute to the cognitive effects of chronic treatment with atypical antipsychotics.

Adrenergic beta-Antagonists↗