PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 6237998

Juggling multiple payers: American problems and foreign solutions.

Abstract

The number and diverse methods of payers are among the principal causes of disarray in American hospital finance. Hospital managers are preoccupied with an intricate and deceptive shifting of costs among payers to maximize their revenues. In all other developed countries third parties cooperate, either voluntarily or by regulation, rather than try to shift costs to each other. In some countries third parties merge and hospital budgets are spread across all payers by standard calculations. In some countries with multiple payers, a common financial office administers all transactions with hospitals. The trend is to concentrate payment in a single source. Hospitals abroad are more stable than those in the United States. With stability, however, come inhibitions against risk, innovation, and failure.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

W A Glaser. 1984. Juggling multiple payers: American problems and foreign solutions.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/6237998/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Investing in Canada's nursing workforce: a comprehensive review to inform policy innovations and directions.

BACKGROUND: Health systems worldwide face persistent health workers challenges including nursing shortages, workforce strain, and inequities. In Canada, these challenges have prompted renewed national and provincial reforms to strengthen recruitment, retention, leadership, and sustainability. This paper compares nursing workforce policy directions across Canada, and international jurisdictions to inform policy and planning. METHODS: A cross-country comparative analysis of policies building on a comprehensive national funded review that included an umbrella review of 69 systematic reviews, a comparative policy review of nursing workforce strategies in five jurisdictions, and validation through national horizon-scanning and policy dialogues (n >100). Evidence was analyzed across system, organizational, and individual levels. RESULTS: At the system level, international jurisdictions demonstrate comprehensive, legislated approaches integrating data, governance, and multi-year funding have advanced key nursing strategies. In Canada, the advances show the importance of strategies to have national and provincial/territorial alignment emphasizing leadership, flexibility, and inclusion as key levers. Organizational and individual-level reforms such as mentorship, leadership development, and wellness initiatives are expanding but remain variably evaluated. Experts identified national workforce data strategies and policy integration with embedded evaluation as key enablers to inform scalability and sustainability of implemented strategies. CONCLUSIONS: Canada's nursing workforce reforms are advancing toward coordinated, equity-driven, and evidence-informed strategies. Continued investment in evaluation, leadership, and national integrated data systems along with integrating nursing workforce planning within broader intersectoral planning will consolidate these gains and position Canada as an international leader in sustainable nursing workforce policy.

Canada