PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 6353903

Transmission electron microscopy and serial sections for light microscopy from the same block in routine renal pathology.

Abstract

Routine serial sections for light microscopy (LM) from one sample and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) from selected areas of another sample are current procedures in renal pathology. At the present time, there are methods available to perform high-resolution light microscopy (HRLM) and TEM from the same block. However, this technology is not directly applicable or convenient for routine renal biopsies. Most methods presently available to obtain TEM studies from different areas of the same large HRLM block use reembedding methods, which considerably delay TEM studies, or mesa technics that fragment and waste the original block. Present methods to obtain serial sections from plastic blocks have been used in plant and animal morphology and need to be modified for renal pathology. In the present article, the authors present a technic that produces immediate TEM sections from different areas of the same HRLM block. This method does not produce fragmentation or waste of the original block, and TEM sections are obtained within two hours after large HRLM sections are screened. The latter sections are mounted serially on a regular microscopic slide on 8-15 separate wells painted with water-repellent ink. The methods are simple and produce large HRLM and TEM sections in 24 hours, avoiding separate samples for LM and TEM studies.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

E O Hoffmann, H B Garrett, J R Coover, T R Flores. 1983. Transmission electron microscopy and serial sections for light microscopy from the same block in routine renal pathology.. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcp%2F80.4.441

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Targeting difficult accessible breast lesions: MRI-guided needle localization using a freehand technique in a 3.0 T closed bore magnet.

PURPOSE: To report the accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided needle localization for diagnosis of MRI detected suspicious breast lesions located in difficult accessible regions of the breast, using the freehand method in a 3.0 T closed bore magnet. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In five patients with five MRI-only breast lesions underwent MRI-guided needle localization for histopathologic evaluation of the lesions. All interventional procedures were performed in a 3.0 T MRI system with the patient in prone position and by using a dedicated phased array breast coil. MRI-guided needle localizations were performed by using a freehand technique. In our study, the high-resolution scan allowed preprocedural localization of all lesions without use of contrast enhancement. In all cases contrast-enhanced MRI was performed after insertion of the wire to confirm the tip of the wire in direct contact with the enhancing lesion. RESULTS: Needle localizations were performed in five patients. Histopathologic evaluation of tissue after surgery excision biopsy revealed one lymph node, three invasive ductal carcinoma and one ductal carcinoma in situ. Lesion size varied from 6 to 30 mm. Mean duration time was 25 min. No complications occurred during the intervention method. In the patient with the benign lesion control MRI of the breast after 6 months confirmed lesion removal. CONCLUSIONS: MRI-guided needle localization by using a freehand technique in a 3.0 T closed bore magnet is a safe and accurate method for diagnosis of difficult accessible breast lesions only visible on MRI.

Biopsy, Needle↗