PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 637708

Primary hyperparathyroidism and peptic ulcer disease.

Abstract

To determine whether primary hyperparathyroidism is related to peptic ulcer disease, we evaluated 46 cases of concomitant primary hyperparathyroidism and peptic ulcer disease. Among these patients, there was no sex preponderance. The pathologic findings at parathyroid surgery, as well as the features of peptic ulcer disease, were the same as in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism or with peptic ulcer disease alone. The ulcer symptoms of 58% of the patients with adequate follow up improved after parathyroidectomy. Sixty-six percent of the patients who had active peptic ulcer disease at surgery improved as compared with only 44% of the patients who had complicated peptic ulcer disease. None of the factors studied (age, sex, serum calcium and serum parathyroid hormone levels, location, and duration of ulcer) had any effect on the peptic ulcer symptoms after parathyroidectomy. Our results and a critical review of the experimental and clinical literature suggest that the association between primary hyperparathyroidism and peptic ulcer disease is no more than coincidental.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

D A Linos, J A van Heerdan, C F Abboud, A J Edis. 1978. Primary hyperparathyroidism and peptic ulcer disease.. https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.1978.01370160042005

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

[Factors influencing neurological care].

OBJECTIVE: To analyse certain factors which contribute to the existing backlog in specialised neurological care, such as: where the patient was referred from, the reason for the appointment, tests carried out and the final diagnosis. We used a random sample of patients. DESIGN: Retrospective study of patients referred from Primary Care, who were attended as out-patients in the Neurology clinic during 1991. SITE. Health Area 2 of the Autonomous Community of Madrid. MAIN MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: The average number of patients per doctor sent from each one of the seven Centres studied was 7.69, with outliers of between 2 and 21, with a standard deviation of 3.95 and a rate of 51.31%. The proportion of new patients to patients having follow-up checks was 2 to 3, respectively. The differences between the number of patients sent from the different centres were found in the less serious pathologies. CONCLUSIONS: We suggest that the criteria used by Primary Care professionals and specialists should be strengthened and unified. This was one of the factors which weighed most on the quality and backlog of care.

Follow-Up Studies