PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 6414192

[General anesthesia or peridural anesthesia in primary cesarean section; a comparative study].

H Kraus·W Dick·E Traub·U Töllner·R Burghard
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

In a prospective cooperative study of gynecologists, anaesthesiologists and pediatricians we compared the effect of continuous epidural anaesthesia (23 cases) and of general anaesthesia (24 cases) on mother and newborn. All patients were delivered in the 39. to 41. week of an uncomplicated pregnancy by primary caesarean section for breech presentation or disproportion. Nearly one third of the patients with epidural anaesthesia showed an initial transitory decrease in blood pressure- up to 25%. The mean pO2 was higher (155 mmHg) in the group with the general anaesthesia than in the group with epidural anaesthesia (88 mmHg). Corresponding values for pO2 were found in the umbilical artery (22,8 mmHg after general anaesthesia, 16,6 mmHg after epidural anaesthesia). Concerning the pH in the umbilical artery, the better results were obtained in the group with continuous epidural anaesthesia (7,3 versus 7,27). After general anaesthesia 9 children had a one minute Apgar-score below 8 versus 3 children after epidural anaesthesia; five and ten minutes after birth the Apgar scores were practically identical. The neurologic examination 15 min after delivery revealed a pathologic muscle tone in three cases after general anaesthesia and in one case after epidural anaesthesia. After 7 days all children showed a normal neurobehavior. As no severe differences between the two types of anaesthesia in the effect on mother or newborn could be seen, in uncomplicated pregnancies the choice should be left to the mother.

Explore related subjects

Anesthesia, EpiduralAnesthesia, GeneralAnesthesia, ObstetricalCarbon DioxideCesarean SectionFemaleHemodynamicsHumansInfant, NewbornOxygenPregnancyComparative StudyEnglish AbstractJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

H Kraus, W Dick, E Traub, U Töllner, R Burghard. [General anesthesia or peridural anesthesia in primary cesarean section; a comparative study].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/6414192/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2007

Effects of epidural anaesthesia on surgical stress-induced immunosuppression during upper abdominal surgery.

BACKGROUND: Previously, we have demonstrated that surgical stress rapidly induced transient hyporesponsiveness of blood cells to endotoxin and that monocyte mCD14 and HLA-DR expression decreased soon after the start of surgery under general anaesthesia. This study was designed to investigate the effects of epidural anaesthesia on surgical stress-induced immunosuppression in patients undergoing upper abdominal surgery. METHODS: After having obtained informed consent, patients were randomly allocated to receive general anaesthesia (Group G) or general anaesthesia with epidural anaesthesia (Group E). Perioperative changes in neutrophil phagocytic activity, neutrophil respiratory burst activity, monocyte mCD14 and HLA-DR expression, plasma IL-10 concentration, and the LPS-induced TNF-alpha production in whole blood were measured. RESULTS: Surgical stress rapidly depressed neutrophil phagocytic activity, monocyte mCD14 and HLA-DR expression, and LPS-induced TNF-alpha production ex vivo (P < 0.05 vs preoperation) in both Group G and Group E. In contrast, the plasma IL-10 concentration increased significantly 2 h after the start of surgery (P < 0.05) in both groups. There were no significant differences between the two groups. The neutrophil respiratory burst activity did not change during the operation in either group. CONCLUSION: This study showed that the innate immune system is suppressed from the early period of upper abdominal surgery. Subgroup analysis suggested that epidural anaesthesia to T4 dermatome as well as general anaesthesia may not protect patients from this immunosuppression. These results in part explain the impairment of host-defense mechanisms seen in the perioperative period.

Anesthesia, Epidural↗
PubMed2007

Local anesthetics.

Local anesthetics are used broadly to prevent or reverse acute pain and treat symptoms of chronic pain. This chapter, on the analgesic aspects of local anesthetics, reviews their broad actions that affect many different molecular targets and disrupt their functions in pain processing. Application of local anesthetics to peripheral nerve primarily results in the blockade of propagating action potentials, through their inhibition of voltage-gated sodium channels. Such inhibition results from drug binding at a site in the channel's inner pore, accessible from the cytoplasmic opening. Binding of drug molecules to these channels depends on their conformation, with the drugs generally having a higher affinity for the open and inactivated channel states that are induced by membrane depolarization. As a result, the effective potency of these drugs for blocking impulses increases during high-frequency repetitive firing and also under slow depolarization, such as occurs at a region of nerve injury, which is often the locus for generation of abnormal, pain-related ectopic impulses. At distal and central terminals the inhibition of voltage-gated calcium channels by local anesthetics will suppress neurogenic inflammation and the release of neurotransmitters. Actions on receptors that contribute to nociceptive transduction, such as TRPV1 and the bradykinin B2 receptor, provide an independent mode of analgesia. In the spinal cord, where local anesthetics are present during epidural or intrathecal anesthesia, inhibition of inotropic receptors, such as those for glutamate, by local anesthetics further interferes with neuronal transmission. Activation of spinal cord mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinases, which are essential for the hyperalgesia following injury or incision and occur in both neurons and glia, is inhibited by spinal local anesthetics. Many G protein-coupled receptors are susceptible to local anesthetics, with particular sensitivity of those coupled via the Gq alpha-subunit. Local anesthetics are also infused intravenously to yield plasma concentrations far below those that block normal action potentials, yet that are frequently effective at reversing neuropathic pain. Thus, local anesthetics modify a variety of neuronal membrane channels and receptors, leading to what is probably a synergistic mixture of analgesic mechanisms to achieve effective clinical analgesia.

Anesthesia, Epidural↗