PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 6493903

TIPP usage.

Abstract

In recent years, physicians have become more concerned about the prevention of childhood accidents. Developed to help physicians teach parents how to avoid unintentional injury, The Injury Prevention Program (TIPP) is significant because anticipatory guidance has now been recognized as being as much a part of routine health supervision as the history and physical examination. The American Academy of Pediatrics' policy statement enclosed with each TIPP package states five goals that deal with major causes of childhood mortality; three can be achieved with a single purchase or action--buying a smoke alarm, buying a bottle of ipecac, and turning down hot water temperature. TIPP comprises three elements: A parent questionnaire (the Framingham safety survey) is used to identify at-risk behavior. Safety sheets to be handed out at the next visit reinforce the information provided by the physician in his or her discussion of the questionnaire results. A model counseling schedule suggests how to incorporate the questionnaire and safety sheets into an effective office program. By gradually phasing TIPP into an office practice, physicians can become familiar with TIPP materials and integrate it in a controlled manner. The AAP Committee on Accident and Poison Prevention is studying measures to increase the usefulness of TIPP.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

L Krassner. 1984. TIPP usage.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/6493903/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Supervision in childhood injury cases: a reliable taxonomy.

This paper describes the development of the "Chicago Children's Supervision Taxonomy" which operationally defines supervision based on the age of an injured child and the ages, familiarity, and proximity of that child's companions. The reliability, coverage, and utility of this taxonomy are illustrated by its application to 142 cases of urban childhood pedestrian injury. All cases were unambiguously classified with good interrater reliability. Most injured children were in unsupervised groups (42%) but 36% had supervisors nearby, thus, supervisor presence does not guarantee protection. Supervising more than one child (especially likely when the supervisor was a teenager) may increase injury risk compared with one-to-one supervision. The taxonomy provides a needed framework adaptable for describing direct supervision in most child injury situations and can facilitate studies of more complex aspects of supervision.

Accident Prevention

Effects of rear-wheel camber on wheelchair stability.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate how using a wheelchair with rear-wheel camber (when the bottoms of the wheels are farther apart than the tops) is associated with the risk of instability incidents, and to determine the effect of camber on wheelchair stability. DESIGN, SETTING, PATIENTS: Epidemiologic data were analyzed from a sample of 576 users of manually propelled wheelchairs in Nova Scotia. A controlled trial was performed using a representative wheelchair occupied by an anthropomorphic test dummy, altering the camber in 5 degrees increments from -15 degrees to +15 degrees. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: For the epidemiologic study, univariate and multivariate analyses were used. To measure the static stability, a tilting platform was used according to the guidelines of the International Organization for Standardization. RESULTS: Camber users reported significantly more instability incidents; of these incidents, more were in the rear direction (40% vs 27%) and fewer in the lateral direction (17% vs 28%) (p < .01). When controlling for other factors, camber was associated with a 3.91-fold increased risk of sustaining an instability incident (p < .001). With increases in camber angle in the laboratory, lateral and forward stability increased and rear stability decreased (with the wheels unlocked and locked) (p < .001). CONCLUSION: Camber use is negatively associated with instability incidents in the lateral direction and positively associated with incidents in the backward direction, probably due in part to the effects of camber on lateral and rear stability.

Accident Prevention