PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 6503798

CT-guided percutaneous biopsy.

G A Lawler·T C Doyle·J Lavan
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Percutaneous biopsy procedures using current imaging methods are becoming increasingly popular. The result of a percutaneous biopsy may lead to a total rejection of surgery, and dictate appropriate palliative therapy in a patient with incurable malignant disease; in others, it will allow more precise preoperative planning. The techniques of percutaneous computed tomographic biopsy procedures is discussed, along with its advantages and disadvantages in comparison with other imaging methods.

Explore related subjects

Biopsy, NeedleFemaleHumansLung NeoplasmsLymphatic DiseasesMaleMiddle AgedNeedlesNeoplasmsPneumothoraxTomography, X-Ray ComputedComparative StudyJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

G A Lawler, T C Doyle, J Lavan. CT-guided percutaneous biopsy.. https://doi.org/10.5694/j.1326-5377.1984.tb132978.x

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2007

Targeting difficult accessible breast lesions: MRI-guided needle localization using a freehand technique in a 3.0 T closed bore magnet.

PURPOSE: To report the accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided needle localization for diagnosis of MRI detected suspicious breast lesions located in difficult accessible regions of the breast, using the freehand method in a 3.0 T closed bore magnet. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In five patients with five MRI-only breast lesions underwent MRI-guided needle localization for histopathologic evaluation of the lesions. All interventional procedures were performed in a 3.0 T MRI system with the patient in prone position and by using a dedicated phased array breast coil. MRI-guided needle localizations were performed by using a freehand technique. In our study, the high-resolution scan allowed preprocedural localization of all lesions without use of contrast enhancement. In all cases contrast-enhanced MRI was performed after insertion of the wire to confirm the tip of the wire in direct contact with the enhancing lesion. RESULTS: Needle localizations were performed in five patients. Histopathologic evaluation of tissue after surgery excision biopsy revealed one lymph node, three invasive ductal carcinoma and one ductal carcinoma in situ. Lesion size varied from 6 to 30 mm. Mean duration time was 25 min. No complications occurred during the intervention method. In the patient with the benign lesion control MRI of the breast after 6 months confirmed lesion removal. CONCLUSIONS: MRI-guided needle localization by using a freehand technique in a 3.0 T closed bore magnet is a safe and accurate method for diagnosis of difficult accessible breast lesions only visible on MRI.

Biopsy, Needle↗