PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 6549331

Leprosy detection through non-survey techniques.

Abstract

Most practical and cheap techniques other than mass surveys to detect leprosy in urban slums are still not known. The population inhabiting a large somewhat isolated slum in North Bombay was exposed to intensive health education programmes over a period of two years. Leprosy cases reporting as a result of these measures as well as those detected by trained workers casually or through contact examination were registered at two weekly clinics conducted within the slum. A total of 184 patients out of whom 27 were smear +ve, were identifiable by these means. The population of the slum was found to be 18228. Total prevalence rate of leprosy after examining 14723 subjects in the colony was revealed to be 24 per 1000 (smear +ve cases: 2.2. per 1000) out of which a prevalence of 12.4 per 1000 (smear +ve cases: 1.8 per 1000) had actually come to our knowledge even before instituting mass surveys. The results of this study indicate that in comparable urban situation it should be possible to identify 54% of total leprosy cases by techniques other than surveys. More significantly a striking feature of this study is that 82% of cases of true public health significance namely smear +ve patients could be unearthed by these means.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

R Ganapati, C R Revankar, K R Bandkar, V V Dongre. Leprosy detection through non-survey techniques.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/6549331/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Patient education and health promotion: clinical health promotion--the conceptual link.

A model linking health promotion, health education and patient education is presented. Claims to health education being distinguishable from patient education on the basis of setting and working with well, as opposed to sick, individuals are disputed. Many health education encounters create the role of proto-patient for the individual receiving care. A further distinction is made between patient education and clinical health promotion on the basis of the focus of care as seen by the professional. The linking elements in the model are those of the patient role and relationships adopted, another distinction is seen in the area of the focus of the encounter. Traditional patient education focuses on the disease process whereas clinical health promotion emphasises the place of illness in the person's life and looks to influence non-medical factors that impinge on the disease.

Health Education