PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 6550076

Allocating your merit increases the SMART way.

R T Miller·J L Campbell·T L Sherman
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Although other formulas for determining merit increases can be developed and implemented successfully, the formula described in this article has been used successfully on a relatively large group of employees. Proper utilization of this method requires effective job evaluation and performance appraisal programs, both of which must have the capability of being summarized quantitatively. Human resource managers generally believe that employee performance is a function of an employee's ability and motivation and that money acts as a motivator. If you share this belief, then you must assure the employees you serve that they will be rewarded impartially and without predilection. The Systematic Merit Allocation Reward Technique is one method through which you can provide this needed assurance.

Explore related subjects

Employee Performance AppraisalPersonnel ManagementPersonnel, HospitalSalaries and Fringe BenefitsJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

R T Miller, J L Campbell, T L Sherman. 1983. Allocating your merit increases the SMART way.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/6550076/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2007

A meta-analytic examination of the goal orientation nomological net.

The authors present an empirical review of the literature concerning trait and state goal orientation (GO). Three dimensions of GO were examined: learning, prove performance, and avoid performance along with presumed antecedents and proximal and distal consequences of these dimensions. Antecedent variables included cognitive ability, implicit theory of intelligence, need for achievement, self-esteem, general self-efficacy, and the Big Five personality characteristics. Proximal consequences included state GO, task-specific self-efficacy, self-set goal level, learning strategies, feedback seeking, and state anxiety. Distal consequences included learning, academic performance, task performance, and job performance. Generally speaking, learning GO was positively correlated, avoid performance GO was negatively correlated, and prove performance GO was uncorrelated with these variables. Consistent with theory, state GO tended to have stronger relationships with the distal consequences than did trait GO. Finally, using a meta-correlation matrix, the authors found that trait GO predicted job performance above and beyond cognitive ability and personality. These results demonstrate the value of GO to organizational researchers.

Employee Performance Appraisal↗
PubMed2007

Balanced scorecards for performance management.

Nurse administrators who manage nursing case management programs are challenged to demonstrate the improved quality of patient care and financial outcomes to their organization that result from such programs. This article introduces the balanced scorecard and discusses its benefits and practical concerns for adopting the scorecard. The balanced scorecard is a useful performance management tool used to both evaluate and direct case management performance in meeting organizational missions and strategies.

Employee Performance Appraisal↗