PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 6552228

Studies evaluating patient teaching: implications for practice.

J Wilson-Barnett·J Osborne
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.

Explore related subjects

Clinical CompetenceEvaluation Studies as TopicHumansNursing CarePatient CompliancePatient Education as TopicSelf CareStress, PsychologicalTeachingJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J Wilson-Barnett, J Osborne. 1983. Studies evaluating patient teaching: implications for practice.. https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-7489(83)90037-8

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed1996

Medical heuristics: the silent adjudicators of clinical practice.

Robust scientific conclusions are too sparse to inform fully most of the choices that physicians must make about tests and treatments. Instead, ad hoc rules of thumb, or "heuristics," must guide them, and many of these are problematic. Physicians extrapolate from the small samples studied by clinical trials to general populations, but they do so inconsistently. Many physicians live by rules that dictate "not treating the numbers," correcting abnormalities slowly, achieving diagnostic certainty, and operating now to avoid "greater" risk in the future. Yet in each case, historical trends or statistical realities suggest either doing the opposite or investing in more discriminating heuristics. The heuristics of medicine should be discussed, criticized, refined, and then taught. More uniform use of explicit and better heuristics could lead to less practice variation and more efficient medical care.

Clinical Competence↗