PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 6596050

Multiple risk factor intervention in cardiovascular disease.

P Magnus
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

This paper describes multiple risk factor intervention, its rationale and the form it takes, referring to recent intervention trials and the issues arising from their approaches and outcomes. Some questions relevant to intervention are raised and some guesses made as to future directions and opportunities.

Explore related subjects

Coronary DiseaseHealth PolicyHumansPrimary PreventionRiskJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

P Magnus. 1984. Multiple risk factor intervention in cardiovascular disease.. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1445-5994.1984.tb03606.x

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2007

Update on PPAR agonists: the clinical significance of FIELD and PROACTIVE.

The peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) family of genes plays a major role in metabolic regulation. Unfortunately, the results of two recent, large event trials of PPAR agonists have been mixed. High rates of crossover to statin use confound the interpretation of the Fenofibrate Intervention and Event Lowering in Diabetes (FIELD) trial, which found a less than expected reduction in coronary and stroke events with fenofibrate. Of concern, nonsignificant increases in coronary and sudden deaths, thrombotic events, and pancreatitis occurred in the fenofibrate group. The PROspective pioglitAzone Clinical Trial In macroVascular Events (PROACTIVE) also found a reduction in coronary and stroke events with pioglitazone compared with placebo in a population with diabetes and cardiovascular disease, but this benefit was counterbalanced by an increase in congestive heart failure as well as symptomatic edema. Further research is needed to determine the role of PPAR agonists in the prevention of cardiovascular disease.

Coronary Disease↗
PubMed2007

Depressive symptoms and sex affect completion rates and clinical outcomes in cardiac rehabilitation.

Symptoms of depression are often seen in patients with coronary heart disease. Symptoms appear more commonly in women and are negatively associated with measures of cardiovascular health. Using multiple logistic regression analyses, the authors evaluated the independent effects of depression (as measured by the Beck Depression Inventory [BDI-II]) and sex on cardiac rehabilitation (CR) completion. In addition, in those who completed CR, the authors evaluated whether depressive symptoms and sex affected clinical outcomes. Women as well as participants with enrollment BDI-II scores > or =14 had significantly higher rates of CR noncompletion. Patients with BDI-II scores > or =14 who completed CR achieved significant improvements in lipid profile, body mass index, and exercise capacity regardless of sex. Women and individuals with BDI-II scores > or =14 are at risk for CR noncompletion and should be encouraged to complete CR, because cardiovascular benefits comparable to those seen in men and individuals with low BDI-II scores were achieved when these patients completed the CR program.

Coronary Disease↗