PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 6664271

[Accommodative convergence trainer].

Abstract

The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Z S Avetisov, L I Aĭzenshtat, S L Shapovalov, M M Nakhatovich, S T Alieva. [Accommodative convergence trainer].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/6664271/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Control of response selection by reinforcer value requires interaction of amygdala and orbital prefrontal cortex.

Goal-directed actions are guided by expected outcomes of those actions. Humans with bilateral damage to ventromedial prefrontal cortex, or the amygdala, are deficient in their ability to use information about positive and negative outcomes to guide their choice behavior. Similarly, rats and monkeys with orbital prefrontal or amygdala damage have been found to be impaired in their responses to changing values of outcomes. In the present study, we tested whether direct, functional interaction between the amygdala and the orbital prefrontal cortex is necessary for guiding behavior based on expected outcomes. Unlike control monkeys, rhesus monkeys with surgical disconnection of these two structures, achieved by crossed unilateral lesions of the amygdala in one hemisphere and orbital prefrontal cortex in the other, combined with forebrain commissurotomy, were unable to adjust their choice behavior after a change in the outcome (here, a reduction in the value of a particular reinforcer). The lesions did not affect motivation to work for a food reinforcer, or food preferences, per se. Hence, the amygdala and orbital prefrontal cortex act as part of an integrated neural system guiding decision-making and adaptive response selection.

Accommodation, Ocular↗

Explaining the moon illusion.

An old explanation of the moon illusion holds that various cues place the horizon moon at an effectively greater distance than the elevated moon. Although both moons have the same angular size, the horizon moon must be perceived as larger. More recent explanations hold that differences in accommodation or other factors cause the elevated moon to appear smaller. As a result of this illusory difference in size, the elevated moon appears to be more distant than the horizon moon. These two explanations, both based on the geometry of stereopsis, lead to two diametrically opposed hypotheses. That is, a depth interval at a long distance is associated with a smaller binocular disparity, whereas an equal depth interval at a smaller distance is associated with a larger disparity. We conducted experiments involving artificial moons and confirmed the hypothesis that the horizon moon is at a greater perceptual distance. Moreover, when a moon of constant angular size was moved closer it was also perceived as growing smaller, which is consistent with the older explanation. Although Emmert's law does not predict the size-distance relationship over long distances, we conclude that the horizon moon is perceived as larger because the perceptual system treats it as though it is much farther away. Finally, we observe that recent explanations substitute perceived size for angular size as a cue to distance. Thus, they imply that perceptions cause perceptions.

Accommodation, Ocular↗

Low doses of pilocarpine do not significantly increase outflow facility in the cynomolgus monkey.

Low doses (10(-9)-10(-6) M) of pilocarpine reportedly increase outflow facility in the organ-cultured human eye, suggesting a direct action on the trabecular meshwork. M3 muscarinic receptors have been found in both cultured human trabecular meshwork cells and tissue. We determined whether low pilo doses would increase outflow facility in the living monkey. The anterior chambers of both eyes of 17 pentobarbital anesthetized cynomolgus monkeys were cannulated and outflow facility measured bilaterally by 2-level constant pressure perfusion after an initial 2 ml exchange with Bárány's perfusand containing 24.5 microM phenylephrine (PE). Two subsequent exchanges were performed with one eye receiving Bárány's + PE + 10(-10)-10(-4) M pilocarpine and the contralateral eye receiving only Bárány's + PE. Outflow facility was measured for 35-40 min following each exchange. Accommodation and pupil diameter were measured before each exchange and approximately every 10 min during facility measurements. Outflow facility was significantly increased by 154 and 313% in eyes treated with 10(-5) M and 10(-4) M pilocarpine, respectively, related to contralateral controls. Accommodation and miosis also were induced only at 10(-5) M (accommodation, 3.3 +/- 1.6 diopters, NS; miosis, -4.1 +/- 0.5 mm, P < or = 0.001) and 10(-4) M (accommodation, 10.6 +/- 0.0 diopters, P < or = 0.02; miosis, -3.4 +/- 1.0 mm, P < or = 0.025) pilocarpine. We conclude that low anterior chamber doses of pilocarpine do not increase outflow facility in the living monkey as reported in the organ-cultured human eye, nor do they induce miosis or accommodation. All three parameters respond to pilocarpine at similar doses, and there is no functional evidence of a meaningful outflow facility-relevant pilocarpine effect on the trabecular meshwork at doses lower than those which affect the ciliary muscle.

Accommodation, Ocular↗