PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 6693074

Extrahepatic biliary atresia.

Abstract

Extrahepatic biliary atresia is defined as partial or total absence of permeable bile duct between porta hepatis and the duodenum. The incidence varies from 1:8,000 to 1:10,000. Cholestasis is total and permanent. 131I Rose Bengal test and needle liver biopsy allow correct identification of 95% of cases before surgery. Before the surgical procedure described by Kasai in 1959, all patients died between 1 and 2 years of age. Through the use of different types of Kasai's procedures by experienced groups, 30 to 35% of patients are successfully operated on. In our group, 248 infants underwent surgery, 121 before 1977: 44 (36.6%) are alive at least 5 years after surgery. Growth is within normal limits in all children still alive, even in those who presented with numerous and severe episodes of cholangitis during the first two postoperative years. Portal hypertension was progressive in 23 children with splenomegaly and esophageal varices developing between 1 and 2 years of age. Five patients bled profusely between 2 and 4 years of age: portal systemic shunts were performed in 4. Surgical liver biopsies were performed in 20 children, 5 to 8 years old: cirrhosis was present in all and was micronodular in 13 and macronodular in 7. The most impressive histologic change was absence of biliary ducts or ductules. This histologic finding can be related with percutaneous transhepatic cholangiographic pictures. Despite the abnormal appearance of intrahepatic bile ducts and the constant presence of cirrhosis with portal hypertension, all 44 patients who are alive at least 5 years after surgery seem to lead almost normal lives.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

D Alagille. Extrahepatic biliary atresia.. https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.1840040704

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Management strategy for congenital choledochal cyst with co-existing intrahepatic dilation and aberrant bile duct as well as other complicated biliary anomalies.

The purpose of this study was to investigate and discuss imaging methods and management strategies for congenital choledochal cyst with co-existing intrahepatic dilation and aberrant bile duct as well as other complicated biliary anomalies. In this study we reviewed and analyzed 72 patients with congenital choledochal cyst, ranging in age from 15 days to 12 years old and who were seen at our hospital during the past 12 years, from January 1993 to October 2005. The image manifestation and clinical significance of patients with co- existing intrahepatic biliary dilation and aberrant bile duct were carefully examined during operation via MRCP, cholangiography and choledochoscope. Twenty-two cases (30.1%) presented with intrahepatic bile duct dilation and 12 of these were of the cystic type. That is, the orifice of the dilated intrahepatic tract that converged into the common hepatic duct showed membrane or septum-like stenosis. In 10 cases the dilation tapered off from the porta hepatis to the initiating terminals of the intra-hepatic bile ducts and was not accompanied by stenosis. An aberrant bile duct was observed in 2 of the cases. In 3 cases, the right and left hepatic ducts converged at the choledochal cyst. In conclusion, the imaging methods for intrahepatic bile duct dilation possess important clinical significance. Further, for hepatojejunostomy with radical excision of a choledochal cyst, additional operative procedures for intrahepatic stenosis, possible bile duct malformation and pancreaticobiliary common duct calculi can potentially reduce postoperative complications.

Bile Ducts↗

Vascular injuries in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: an underestimated problem.

BACKGROUND: Bile duct injury is a severe complication of laparoscopic cholecystectomy and many reports focus on this topic, especially regarding the long-term success of repair of these injuries. There is some concern, however, as to whether concomitant vascular injuries can jeopardize reconstruction of a bile duct injury following laparoscopic cholecystectomy. METHODS: A review of the current literature on the clinical significance and management of a concomitant vascular injury to the outcome of reconstruction of bile duct injuries following laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Relevant articles were extracted through PubMed, with secondary references obtained from key articles. RESULTS: Although the relevant literature is generally poor, there is a trend of appearance of relatively large series on the topic over the last five years, as opposed to case reports or small series during the previous decade. CONCLUSION: The disruption of the hepatic arterial flow during laparoscopic cholecystectomy is usually well tolerated in an otherwise healthy patient. There is strong evidence that concomitant vascular injuries do not have any impact on mortality after biliary reconstruction. There is also evidence that does increase overall morbidity, but when it comes specifically to long-term anastomotic stricture formation, there is no strong evidence to support a negative impact of a concomitant vascular injury; this is especially true for centers/surgeons with HPB interest.

Bile Ducts↗