PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 6706474

Contrast sensitivity in asymmetric glaucoma.

Abstract

We measured central contrast sensitivity in both eyes of 27 patients with asymmetric glaucomatous visual field loss or optic disc cupping. In 15 patients contrast sensitivity was less in the eye that by perimetry or ophthalmoscopy was the more severely damaged. In 10 patients contrast sensitivity was the same in the two eyes. In two patients, it was impaired more in the eye with the normal visual field. However, the latter two patients had ophthalmoscopic evidence of optic nerve damage (disc hemorrhage or large cup) in the eye with the lower contrast sensitivity, even though the visual field was normal. Asymmetry of contrast sensitivity was not found in normal control subjects. These results suggest that glaucoma does alter central vision, even when visual acuity remains normal and visual field defects are far from fixation. Contrast sensitivity may be impaired by a different mechanism than that which leads to visual dield loss. Although the two types of visual dysfunction often occur together, some patients may have more severe impairment of central vision (as measured by contrast sensitivity testing) in one eye and more severe loss of peripheral vision (as measured by perimetry) in the other eye.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

M A Motolko, C D Phelps. 1984. Contrast sensitivity in asymmetric glaucoma.. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00138269

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Do scleral flap dimensions influence reliability of intraocular pressure control in experimental trabeculectomy?

AIM: To compare the effect on intraocular pressure (IOP) of large vs small scleral flap size during trabeculectomy using adjustable sutures. METHODS: Trabeculectomy operations were performed on nine donor human eyes connected to a constant flow infusion with real-time IOP monitoring. Large scleral flaps (4 x 4 mm, 16 mm(2), n=12) or small scleral flaps (3 x 2 mm, 6 mm(2), n=9) were constructed over 0.76 mm(2) sclerostomies. For each procedure, equilibrium IOP was measured following tight closure with two four-throw adjustable 10-0 nylon sutures. RESULTS: Five scleral flaps were thin or poorly constructed; four of these were in the initial seven procedures, implying learning effect. These had a mean absolute IOP of 7.6 mmHg (range 2.7-12.4 mmHg) and mean relative IOP of 28.3% of baseline (range 10-45.8%) after closure. In the remaining 16 good quality procedures, mean IOP was 1.3 mmHg (range 0-3.4 mmHg) after sclerostomy, confirming minimal outflow resistance before closure. Following flap closure mean IOP was 20 mmHg (SD 4.4, range 15.5-29.3 mmHg) for large (n=8), and 18.7 mmHg (SD 3.6, 15.9-25.8 mmHg) for small (n=8) flaps (unpaired t-test, P=0.26). Mean IOP (% baseline) was 71.6% (SD 8.4, range 60.6-86.6%) and 66% (SD=12.7, 46.8-86.6%) for large and small flap groups, respectively (unpaired t-test, P=0.2). CONCLUSIONS: Well-constructed scleral flaps of both sizes were able to support an average IOP at least two-thirds of baseline, and both had similar absolute IOP levels. Errors in flap construction resulted in loss of IOP control. Smaller flap size does not appear to compromise control of early postoperative IOP using adjustable sutures.

Glaucoma↗