PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 6707566

Teamwork, myth or reality: community nurses' experience with general practice attachment.

Abstract

A survey of 93 community nurses, 48 health visitors, and 45 district nurses was carried out in one area health authority where nurses had been attached to general practice schemes for up to 10 years. The purpose of the study was to determine the nurses' impression of teamwork within their attachment arrangements. Half the group surveyed had either a geographical area or other area health authority responsibilities, or both, in addition to their primary attachment commitment. No structured plan for preparing or evaluating attachment groups had been carried out by the area health authority. Only one third of attached nurses were working from premises shared with other members of the attachment group, and often facilities were poorly designed for teamwork. Health visitors were generally less enthusiastic about attachment and identified more obstacles in developing teamwork than did district nurses. Health visitors also tended to stay with individual attachment groups for shorter periods than did district nurses. Most nurses communicated frequently with attachment group members, but these opportunities were unplanned and usually limited to immediate problems of patient care. In a few attachments patterns of communication and collaboration appeared to be non-existent. Despite the problems identified in this study, most respondents prefer attachment to working solely in a geographical area and value their links the area health authority. Evaluation and positive direction is needed if the primary care team is to develop.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

L M McClure. 1984. Teamwork, myth or reality: community nurses' experience with general practice attachment.. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.38.1.68

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Information-sharing among couples considering multifetal pregnancy reduction.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the information-sharing strategies of couples considering fetal reduction, and the impact of these strategies on the chances of encountering hostility in their social networks. DESIGN: Cross-sectional design of semistructured qualitative interviews, coded with respect to sharing strategies and level of personally directed hostility encountered. SETTING: Multiple Pregnancy Management Program, Comprehensive Genetics, New York, New York. PATIENT(S) AND INTERVENTION(S): Fifty women and their partners who were making a first visit to our maternal-fetal management facility, in order to consider the possibility of multifetal reduction as a pregnancy-management strategy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Development of information-sharing strategies, and the chances of encountering personally directed hostility regarding multifetal reduction associated with more and less selective strategies. RESULT(S): Four information-sharing strategies emerged from the analysis. Two of these strategies were relatively open (extended network, and both parents). Two other strategies were relatively selective (qualified family and friends, and defended relationship). The selective strategies were significantly less likely to encounter to encounter personally directed hostility (odds ratio, 3.88; 95% confidence intervals, 0.87-17.30). CONCLUSION(S): Selective sharing of information for couples considering multifetal prgnancy reduction is a potentially useful strategy for moderating potentially stressful relationships in their social networks. Clinics should find a way of integrating the discussion of selective sharing into their clinic's cultural repertoire of patient-support services.

Communication↗