PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 6728356

Satiating efficiency and a strategy for conducting food loading experiments.

Abstract

The general hypothesis is proposed that foods vary along a small number of dimensions, such as nutrient composition, energy content, or weight, each of which makes a potentially measurable, but presently unknown, contribution to the satiation process. Because of the differential contributions of each of these dimensions (or factors), foods will vary in the effectiveness with which they induce satiety. Predictions of this hypothesis can best be tested by using the preloading strategy, in which preloads, varied along one dimension at a time, are given on different occasions in amounts which vary along the dimension being studied, and the experimental subject is permitted to eat the test meal following the preload until satiated. The contribution of that dimension is then assessed by the equation relating intake of the test meal to the magnitude of preload along the chosen dimension. The negative of the slope of the intake-preload equation is an index we call "satiating efficiency" of the magnitude of the satiating effect per unit of the chosen dimension. The satiating efficiency therefore provides a method of comparing the ability of different foods to induce satiety, along any dimension. This strategy can be used theoretically to measure the contribution of various dimensions of food to satiety. Practically it could be used to improve the satiating efficiency of foods designed for appetite control, by incorporating into the food, components which are high in satiating efficiency per unit of energy.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

H R Kissileff. 1984. Satiating efficiency and a strategy for conducting food loading experiments.. https://doi.org/10.1016/0149-7634(84)90028-9

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

A randomized study of the efficacy of sensory-motor-oral stimulation and non-nutritive sucking in very low birthweight infant.

UNLABELLED: To assess if sensory-motor-oral stimulation and non-nutritive sucking gavage feeding enhances the oral feeding performance of preterm infants born between 26 and 32 weeks of gestational age. STUDY DESIGN: Very low birthweight infants (n=98) were randomized into a experimental and control group. Preterm infants in the experimental group received sensory-motor-oral stimulation and non-nutritive sucking and infants in the control group received a sham stimulation program. Both were administered from when they reached enteral diet (100 kcal/kg/day) until the beginning of oral diet. Primary outcome was length of hospital stay. RESULTS: Independent oral feeding was attained significantly earlier in the experimental group than the control group, 38+/-16 days of life (mean+/-S.D.) versus 47+/-17 days of life, respectively (P<0.001) There was significant difference in length of hospital stay between the two groups (41.9+/-17 (mean+/-S.D.) versus 52.3+/-19 days (P<0.01)). CONCLUSION: Sensory-motor-oral stimulation, together with early non-nutritive sucking (as soon as the newborn reaches full diet and is clinically stable) in very low birthweight preterm infants, as long as they are clinically stable, in this study, earlier initiation of oral feeding and earlier hospital discharge.

Eating↗