PubMed · 6732344
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
D A Murphy. 1984. Aortic cannulation techniques.. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0003-4975(10)61150-2
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
Lipoprotein lipase (LPL), bound to the luminal surface of vascular endothelium catalyzes lipoprotein triglyceride hydrolysis. Studies were performed to identify human aortic endothelial (HAEC) cell-surface proteins having high affinity for LPL. LPL-sepharose affinity chromatography of [35S]O4 labeled HAEC proteins identified a 220-kDa proteoglycan. Ligand blotting of HAEC plasma membrane proteins with LPL revealed two specific binding proteins of MW 116 kDa and 85 kDa, respectively, which were not released from the cell-surface by heparin treatment. Since the 220-kDa and 116-kDa proteins have been reported previously in bovine endothelial cells, we focused on the 85-kDa protein. The 85-kDa protein was not labelled by incubation of the cells with [35S]O4, suggesting that it is not a sulfated proteoglycan. Treatment of HAEC with tunicamycin markedly decreased detection of the 85-kDa protein, suggesting that it is likely a glycoprotein synthesized by HAEC. We conclude that HAEC cell surface has three specific LPL binding proteins, a 220-kDa proteoglycan, a 116-kDa protein and a novel 85-kDa protein.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Respiratory ordered phase encoding is often employed in MRI studies to reduce image artifacts due to breathing motion. The purpose of this work was to evaluate error caused by the use of respiratory ordering of phase encoding in MR cine phase-contrast (CPC) volumetric flow measurements when the flow rate is sensitive to respiration. It was hypothesized that this effect is due to the systematic biasing of a respiratory-induced phase modulation function in k-space. A theoretical model for the effects of respiration was developed and then tested in flow phantom studies and in normal volunteer studies. In phantom experiments, the use of respiratory ordering induced an error of as much as 13% in CPC volumetric flow measurements. In preliminary volunteer studies, error was as high as 26% in superior vena cava flow measurements versus less than 1% error in the ascending aorta. It is concluded that a potential for error exists in CPC volumetric flow measurements obtained with the use of respiratory ordering schemes. Volunteer studies with larger numbers are warranted. Clinical applications in which this effect may be important include flow measurements in vessels subject to variations in flow due to respiration, such as the venae cavae, pulmonary vasculature, and portal vein.