PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 6747007

Do patients like psychometric testing by computer?

Abstract

Programmed a micro-computer to administer and score the Crown-Crisp Experiential Index (CCEI) (Crown & Crisp, 1979) for a study of the psychological state of 59 newly delivered mothers. This publication reports the findings of a separate paper-and-pencil questionnaire assessment of the patients' attitudes to the computer itself. The 59 patients were almost unanimous in finding the computer acceptable and easy to use; only 1 S minded using it. None found the instructions difficult to understand, and only 1 had difficulty in reading them. Only 2 would object to using the computer again.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

N C Moore, K R Summer, R N Bloor. 1984. Do patients like psychometric testing by computer?. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-4679(198405)40%3A3%3C875%3A%3Aaid-jclp2270400343%3E3.0.co%3B2-6

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Quality of life and driving in recipients of the implantable cardioverter-defibrillator.

UNLABELLED: The efficacy of a treatment is primarily based on objective criteria, such as mortality and morbidity. Besides these criteria, the interest in measuring quality of life (QOL) in relation to health care has increased in recent years. Although the concept of patients' QOL is inherently subjective, and definitions vary, it can be assessed on a basis of 3 major components: physical condition, psychological well-being, and social activities. The basic requirements of QOL assessments are: multidimensional construct, reliability, validity, sensitivity, responsiveness, appropriateness to question or use, and practical utility. The instruments to assess QOL can be disease specific or generic, depending on the context. In 1991 a prospective and systematic evaluation of QOL in implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) recipients was started at the University of Bonn: psychological profile and patient acceptance were assessed in 57 consecutive patients using a specifically designed questionnaire. The results of this pilot study demonstrated that the acceptance of the ICD was remarkably high. Restrictions on driving a vehicle may have a substantial impact on QOL in patients with ICDs. A specifically designed questionnaire was addressed to 47 European national delegates in order to determine their present practices and criteria utilized when advising driving restrictions to patients after ICD implantation. Of the 39 (83%) respondents, 22 (56%) cardiologists advised all patients to abstain from driving--13 (33%) advising permanent abstinence, while 26 (67%) recommended temporary driving abstinence for periods of 3-18 months (mean 9 +/- 4 months). Despite medical advice not to drive, one third of the patients resume driving; half of the patients resumed driving after 6 months, with the vast majority driving within 12 months after ICD surgery. Two patients experienced ICD discharges while driving, but no motor vehicle accident occurred. Another patient had a motor vehicle collision with a fatal outcome, which was not caused by loss of consciousness or ICD discharge. CONCLUSIONS: (1) Fatal accidents or ICD discharges while driving are a rare finding in ICD patients. (2) About half of the physicians always advise their patients to cease driving for a period of 9 +/- 4 months. Despite this medical advice, the majority of the patients resume driving within 6 months of ICD implantation. (3) Criteria used in advising driving abstinence are not uniform among physicians.

Attitude