PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 6834207

Auditory brainstem response as screening tool.

Abstract

The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

1983. Auditory brainstem response as screening tool.. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-3476(83)80215-7

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Screening for neonatal and infant deafness in Europe in 1992.

Many methods of screening for hearing impairment are available. The aim of our study was to determine which ones were really used in 1992. At the request of the British Audiology Society, we conducted an inquiry into the organization of screening for deafness in neonates and infants in Europe. In practice all 6-9 month-old infants are tested with behavioural tests in every country. For the neonates, generally only those at risk for hearing-impairment (about 5%) were tested. The most widely used tests were behavioural ones. Only specialized centers used transient evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAEs). This last test assesses the active mechanical properties of the cochlea and allows detection of even mild or unilateral sensorineural deafness.

Audiometry

Brainstem lesions and click lateralization in patients with multiple sclerosis.

The ability to lateralize dichotic clicks with either interaural time delays (ITD) or interaural level differences (ILD) was tested in seven multiple sclerosis (MS) subjects who had normal audiograms. Along with the psychoacoustical tests, magnetic resonance images (MRI) of the subjects' brainstem were obtained. After matching each MRI section with the corresponding section of a computerized atlas of the brainstem, the parts of the auditory pathway affected by each MS lesion were determined. Of the seven subjects two performed normally with both types of interaural asymmetry and had no brainstem lesions involving the auditory pathway. Two subjects performed normally only with level differences, but perceived all the dichotic clicks with different ITDs in the center of the head; both had lesions involving the trapezoid body. Three subjects could not perform normally with either task, perceiving the clicks to the sides and never in the center for both ITDs and ILDs; all three had unilateral lesions of the lateral lemniscus. A multi-level decision making model is proposed to account for these results.

Audiometry