PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 7051999

A modified Sugiura procedure.

Abstract

The Sugiura procedure for esophageal varices combines splenectomy with esophagogastric devascularization, which destroys the intraesophageal portacaval shunt but preserves periesophageal portacaval shunts. We have modified the total vagotomy and pyloroplasty and sutured esophageal anastomosis of the original operation. A single left thoracoabdominal incision is used. Esophagogastric devascularization is performed without dividing the main vagus trunks; only a proximal gastric vagotomy is done, thereby avoiding a pyloroplasty. The esophageal transection and reanastomosis are performed with the circular End-to-End Anastomosis stapler and protected with a loose-fundal wrap. Fifteen of 20 patients have had good to excellent results, with rapid recovery and no recurrent esophagogastric bleeding or any hepatic encephalopathy in follow-up of two months to two years. Four patients, who were bleeding massively at the time of operation and who were in Child's class C with gross ascites, muscle wasting, ad coagulopathy, died in the postoperative period. Conceptually, the operation is original and exciting because it preserves hepatic blood flow and the beneficial periesophageal shunt, while destroying the harmful intraesophageal shunt. Our early experience encourages us to continue using this operation, except in those patients who bleed massively and are in Child's C, end-stage, class.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

R J Ginsberg, P F Waters, R A Zeldin, E H Spratt, B Shandling, R M Stone, S Strasberg. 1982. A modified Sugiura procedure.. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0003-4975(10)62494-0

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Management of acute bleeding from portal hypertension.

Gastrointestinal bleeding is a frequent and severe complication of portal hypertension. The most frequent cause of the bleeding is variceal rupture. Despite improvements in prognosis after variceal bleeding over the past two decades, the 6-week mortality rate remains high, ranging from 15 to 30%. Patients die from uncontrolled bleeding, early rebleeding, infection, or renal failure within the first weeks of a bleeding episode. Poor hepatic function, severe portal hypertension with a hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) >20 mmHg, and active bleeding at endoscopy are independently associated with poor prognosis. First-line treatment includes resuscitation, prophylactic antibiotic therapy, the combined use of vasoactive drugs (started as soon as possible), and an endoscopic procedure. Reconstitution of blood volume should be done cautiously to maintain the haematocrit between 25 and 30%. Terlipressin, somatostatin, or octreotide can be used, and drug therapy is maintained from 48 h to 5 days. Ligation is the endoscopic treatment of choice in bleeding oesophageal varices; in gastric varices, obturation with cyanoacrylate is preferable. Uncontrolled bleeding should be an indication for a salvage transjugular portosystemic shunt (TIPS). In patients with Child-Pugh score A, shunt surgery might be an alternative to TIPS. Trials are currently ongoing into the precise indications of early TIPS in selected patients with an HVPG >20 mmHg, and into the usefulness of administration of recombinant activated factor VII when there is an active bleeding at endoscopy.

Esophageal and Gastric Varices↗

The implications of publication bias for meta-analysis' other parameter.

Perhaps the greatest threat to the validity of a meta-analysis is the possibility of publication bias, where studies that are interesting or statistically significant are more likely to be published than those with less encouraging results. In particular, there is the concern that this bias might be 'one-sided', where studies indicating that the treatment is beneficial have a greater probability of publication. The impact that this type of bias has on the estimate of treatment effect has received a great deal of attention but this also has implications for estimates of between-study variance. Using step functions to model the bias it can be demonstrated that it is impossible to make generalizations concerning how we should revise estimates of between-study variance when presented with the possibility of publication bias. To determine this, assumptions must be made concerning the form that the bias takes, which is unknown in practice.

Esophageal and Gastric Varices↗