PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 7059746

Changing faces: visual and non-visual coding processes in face recognition.

Abstract

Two experiments examined the effect of recognition accuracy and latency of changing the view of faces between presentation and test. In Expt 1, all the faces were unfamiliar to the subjects. Faces at test were either unchanged, or changed in angle (e.g. full face to 3/4), expression (e.g. smiling to unsmiling) or both. Unchanged faces were recognized more quickly and accurately than faces with a change in angle or expression which were in turn better than faces with both changed. In Expt 2, half the faces were highly familiar to the subjects, and at test unfamiliar and familiar faces were either unchanged or changed in both angle and expression. Unfamiliar faces were recognized more slowly and less accurately if changed at test, while familiar faces were recognized more slowly though no less accurately if change (though performance was effectively at ceiling). Familiar faces were recognized more quickly and accurately than unfamiliar, though false positive rates and rejection latencies were similar for familiars and unfamiliars. The results are discussed in terms of the combination of information from "pictorial', "structural', and "semantic' and "name' codes.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

V Bruce. 1982. Changing faces: visual and non-visual coding processes in face recognition.. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8295.1982.tb01795.x

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Activity in the human primary motor cortex related to ipsilateral hand movements.

In two studies with positron emission tomography (PET), we found that somatosensory discrimination of length activated the ipsilateral MI, but somatosensory discrimination of shape did not. This occurred even though both tasks required the exclusive use of distal finger and hand movements which were also very similar in both tasks. The activation of the ipsilateral MI was correlated with activations of the premotor cortex in the other hemisphere, the prefrontal cortex and the posterior cingulate cortex, indicating that these areas together with the ipsilateral MI constitute a task-related active network.

Discrimination Learning

Some shear facts and pure friction related to roughness discrimination and the cutaneous control of grasping.

The question of whether friction contributes to the perception of roughness has been overdebated and underinvestigated. A review of the psychophysical literature suggests that roughness and friction can be subjectively distinguished very effectively, although the same rapidly adapting Meissner corpuscles (RA1s) and slowly adapting Merkel receptors (SA1s) are stimulated by both stimuli. It appears that to achieve the subjective appreciation of roughness, the brain must learn to ignore variations in the speed of movement over the skin, the perpendicular force applied to the receptor surface, and the shear forces tangential to the skin generated by friction. Similarly, the subjective appreciation of slipperiness requires selective attention to tangential forces to the exclusion of speed, perpendicular force, and surface texture. A clearer picture is gradually emerging concerning the detection and appreciation of shear forces from investigations of the grasping and lifting of objects of different surfaces against the force of gravity. Although high shear forces provoke larger responses in almost all skin mechano-receptors, some neurons in both the sensory and motor cortex discharge more vigorously with smooth textures and lower coefficients of friction. Although populations of such neurons sensitive to smooth surfaces and low friction would be very useful in detecting both potential and real slips, just how the afferent signals are derived remains puzzling.

Discrimination Learning