PubMed · 7201697
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
D P Shattuck, O T von Ramm. 1982. Compound scanning with a phased array.. https://doi.org/10.1177/016173468200400201
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the prevention of respiratory complications after abdominal surgery by a comparison of a global policy of incentive spirometry with a regimen consisting of deep breathing exercises for low risk patients and incentive spirometry plus physiotherapy for high risk patients. DESIGN: Stratified randomised trial. SETTING: General surgical service of an urban teaching hospital. PATIENTS: 456 patients undergoing abdominal surgery. Patients less than 60 years of age with an American Society of Anesthesia classification of 1 were considered to be at low risk. OUTCOME MEASURES: Respiratory complications were defined as clinical features consistent with collapse or consolidation, a temperature above 38 degrees C, plus either confirmatory chest radiology or positive results on sputum microbiology. We also recorded the time that staff devoted to prophylactic respiratory therapy. RESULTS: There was good baseline equivalence between the groups. The incidence of respiratory complications was 15% (35/231) for patients in the incentive spirometry group and 12% (28/225) for patients in the mixed therapy group (P = 0.40; 95% confidence interval -3.6% to 9.0%). It required similar amounts of staff time to provide incentive spirometry and deep breathing exercises for low risk patients. The inclusion of physiotherapy for high risk patients, however, resulted in the utilisation of an extra 30 minutes of staff time per patient. CONCLUSIONS: When the use of resources is taken into account, the most efficient regimen of prophylaxis against respiratory complications after abdominal surgery is deep breathing exercises for low risk patients and incentive spirometry for high risk patients.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to examine local and systemic reactions of the body to a pneumoperitoneum to elucidate potential dangers and risks of laparoscopic procedures. STUDY DESIGN: Laparoscopy was performed on 25 pigs. The pigs were divided into five groups by level of intraabdominal pressure (14 and 18 mm Hg) and gas used (carbon dioxide and air). The effects of the pneumoperitoneum on cardiopulmonary condition and the peritoneal milieu were observed. These effects should be the result of various changes as the mechanical, ventilatory, cellular, hormonal, and immunologic levels. RESULTS: In this animal study marked changes in the peritoneal milieu were observed, and we demonstrated that these changes were dependent on the gas used, intraabdominal pressure, and duration of application. Locally these changes are manifest in the development of severe peritoneal acidosis, hypercapnia, and the release of various mediators. Systemic changes, in particular cardiopulmonary changes, also depend on the intraabdominal pressure and the gas used. CONCLUSION: During conventional pneumoperitoneum the peritoneum might change to a large extent so that the development of new risks are possibly encouraged. A reduction in intraabdominal pressure with the use of carbon dioxide as the insufflation gas should result in normal acid-base balance.
BACKGROUND: Incisional hernia is a serious complication of abdominal surgery. We compared incisional hernia frequency following gastric bypass (GBP) for morbid obesity versus total abdominal colectomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) for ulcerative colitis. A prefascial polypropylene mesh repair was also evaluated. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All patients had midline incisions, xiphoid to umbilicus in GBP patients and midepigastrium to pubis in IPAA patients. Fascia were closed with running No. 2 polyglycolic acid suture. Ninety-eight patients underwent prefascial polypropylene mesh repair; 80 were GBP patients, 46 had 1 previous repair, and 17 had 2 to 9 previous repairs (6 with properitoneal mesh). RESULTS: Incisional hernia occurred in 20% (198/968) of GBP patients (19% without versus 41% with a previous hernia, P < 0.001) versus 4% (7/171) of the IPAA patients (P < 0.001), of whom 102 (60%) were taking prednisone (32 +/- 2 mg/d) and 5 were quite obese (body mass index > or = 30 kg/m2). Additional risk factors for hernia in GBP patients included wound infection, diabetes, sleep apnea, and obesity hypoventilation. For the 98 patients who underwent prefascial polypropylene mesh repair, the mean follow-up was 20 +/- 2 months (range 6 to 104), and complications occurred in 35% of patients, including minor wound infection (12%), major wound infection (5%), seroma (5%), hematoma (3%), chronic pain (6%), and recurrent hernia (4%). CONCLUSIONS: Severe obesity is a greater risk factor for incisional hernia and hernia recurrence than chronic steroid use in nonobese colitis patients. A prefascial polypropylene mesh repair minimizes recurrence.