PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 7224111

[Computer-assisted documentation in anesthesia (author's transl)].

Abstract

Details are given of a Dietz microprocessor with 48 K Bytes core memory for anaesthetic documentation. The experiences gained with this equipment over a period of two years are reviewed. The storage capacity is sufficiently large to allow its use by several persons for the processing of more than 20,000 anaesthetic records per year. The preparation of the anaesthetic record takes a skilled technician about two minutes. The prompt evaluation of the data and their presentation on either screen or print-out are the main advantages of this system. Information regarding the course of anaesthesia, complications, the identity of the anaesthetist are available instantly and at any time and can be referred to if organizational problems arise. The fact that all relevant data and criteria can be called up whenever wanted also acts as a spur to make use of the information. The system still needs some improvement to make it more efficient.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

H Lutz, I Kunze. 1980. [Computer-assisted documentation in anesthesia (author's transl)].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7224111/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Perception of training needs and opportunities in advanced airway skills: a survey of British and Irish trainees.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: We surveyed delegates at the Group of Anaesthetists in Training (UK) meeting to investigate evidence of a training-gap (number of fibreoptic intubations believed to bestow competence vs. number actually performed). METHODS: Questionnaires were distributed to and collected from delegates in person. Questions covered six areas, including experience of fibreoptic intubation and cricothyrotomy, fibreoptic intubation as a specialist skill and ethical issues. RESULTS: We received 221 replies (76%). All trainees believed competence to be achievable with 10 intubations (interquartile range (IQR) 10-20); the median number performed was 2 (IQR 0-4). This was statistically significant for the groups' senior house officers, 1st and 2nd year registrars and 3rd and 4th year registrars; P < 0.0001. Many final year trainees (12/20, 60%) also failed to achieve their competency target. Few trainees had seen or performed any cricothyrotomies (medians 0, IQRs 0-1 and 0-0). Most (195/208, 94%) believed that fibreoptic intubation was a core skill and 199/212 (94%) believed that all should be competent by completion of training. Ten percent (n = 208) felt it unethical to perform an awake training intubation with full consent and 10% believed it acceptable without explanation. Most (82.7%) would fibreoptically intubate an asleep patient (requiring intubation) without consent. CONCLUSION: Trainees reported a gap between their perception of competence and achievement in awake fibreoptic intubation. Simple and complex simulations and structured training programmes may help. Anaesthetists must address the ethics of clinical training in advanced airway management.

Anesthesiology↗