PubMed2026
BACKGROUND: A minority of blood donors are Rh(D)-negative, and Rh(D)-negative red blood cell (RBC) products are often overutilized. As such, Rh(D)-negative RBCs may be difficult to maintain in blood bank inventory. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: We changed our blood bank laboratory policy to approve non-alloimmunized Rh(D)-negative patients to receive Rh(D)-positive RBCs for routine transfusion under defined criteria. Those criteria included Rh(D)-negative males (all ages) and females (aged >50 years) who were designated as do not resuscitate (DNR), either with or without intubation, in the electronic medical record. RESULTS: From August 15, 2024 through August 15, 2025, a total of 204 Rh(D)-negative patients met the above criteria and were approved to receive routine Rh(D)-positive RBC transfusions. Within that group, 23 patients received Rh(D)-positive RBCs. The remaining patients either did not require transfusion or were issued Rh(D)-negative RBC units. Since implementing this practice, a total of 68 Rh(D)-negative units were conserved during this time frame. Notably, 28 of the 68 units (41%) were type O, Rh(D)-negative. DISCUSSION: Rh(D)-positive RBCs can be routinely given to non-alloimmunized Rh(D)-negative patients who are not at risk for developing hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn (HDFN). By creating clear guidelines for the routine administration of Rh(D)-positive RBCs to patients who are not at risk for HDFN, the inventory of Rh(D)-negative RBC units can be directed to those patients who would most benefit from this limited resource.