PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 7363529

Informed consent 1980.

Abstract

The right of a patient, in most cases, to have the final authority to consent to a treatment, operation, or diagnostic procedure is guaranteed by 200 years of legal precedent. The right of that same patient to be adequately informed so that the decision is entirely his or her own seems to be equally well protected. It is unlikely that the medical profession can find a mechanical solution to the problem. That intangible patient-physician relationship must be developed to the point where there is a true interchange of the same information a physician would use to consent to undergo such a procedure or agree to it for a loved one. Finally, the physicians must decide, on the basis of their experience, the literature, personal attorney input, and other sources, the best method of documenting that moment when truly informed consent has been obtained.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

R S Brittain. 1980. Informed consent 1980.. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003081-198003000-00017

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Some legal aspects of mental capacity.

This article discusses some practical matters which arise when competence to make decisions is in question. Consent, testamentary capacity, powers of attorney, the Court of Protection, "living wills," and research on people with dementia are briefly considered.

Comprehension

The ethics of eating a drug-company donut.

How does a physician make medical decisions? Is medical ethics a field that shifts according to the views of individual doctors? A physician who recently completed his residency muses on some of the ethical decision making he witnessed during his training.

Comprehension

Consent form readability in university-sponsored research.

BACKGROUND: Consent forms are required in most biomedical research involving human subjects. In recent years, a number of studies from different disciplines have reported problems related to consent form readability. METHODS: We analyzed 284 consent forms submitted to and approved by five institutional review boards (IRBs) (schools of Medicine, Nursing, Academic Affairs, Dentistry, and Public Health) at one university and one IRB at another. We examined consent form readability scores and factors that might relate to readability. RESULTS: The average reading level of all consent forms was high: 12.2, which corresponds roughly to a 12th-grade reading level. Less than 10% of all consent forms were written at a 10th grade reading level or below. Thirty-two percent of all consent forms had no evidence of revisions, and less than 2% of consent forms were revised more than once. Readability scores were not related to consent form revisions, the type of IRB, the year of study, or the university where the research was conducted. CONCLUSIONS: Poor readability of consent forms probably occurs in all university-related research. We recommend that IRBs require readability checks for research consent forms before researchers submit their proposals to an IRB.

Comprehension