PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 7372926

Cochlear models: two-tone suppression and the second filter.

Abstract

With advances in our understanding of the auditory periphery, models of cochlear mechanics have evolved from descriptions of existing data to the point that they can suggest meaningful observations that should be made and predict expected outcomes. As an example, we discuss relationships among mechanical nonlinearities in the inner ear, two-tone suppression, and the auditory "second filter." Electrophysiological two-tone suppression data indicate that excitatory tuning curves (stimulus intensity required to elicit a specified amount of activity in a primary fiber as a function of frequency) are more sharply tuned than suppressive tuning curves (stimulus intensity required to suppress the response to a continuous tone at the fiber's characteristic frequency by a specified amount as a function of frequency). Model simulations which attempt to account for the above difference suggest that there must be a stage of sharpening between the physical variable governing two-tone suppression (tentatively identified as velocity of the basilar membrane) and the physical variable governing neural excitation. An experiment that would unequivocally demonstrate the simultaneous existence of two representations of the stimulus with significantly different tuning properties in the cochlea is described. The future evolution of cochlear modeling, incorporating nonlinear two-dimensional models, is discussed.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J L Hall. 1980. Cochlear models: two-tone suppression and the second filter.. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.384298

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Spectral-temporal receptive fields of nonlinear auditory neurons obtained using natural sounds.

The stimulus-response function of many visual and auditory neurons has been described by a spatial-temporal receptive field (STRF), a linear model that for mathematical reasons has until recently been estimated with the reverse correlation method, using simple stimulus ensembles such as white noise. Such stimuli, however, often do not effectively activate high-level sensory neurons, which may be optimized to analyze natural sounds and images. We show that it is possible to overcome the simple-stimulus limitation and then use this approach to calculate the STRFs of avian auditory forebrain neurons from an ensemble of birdsongs. We find that in many cases the STRFs derived using natural sounds are strikingly different from the STRFs that we obtained using an ensemble of random tone pips. When we compare these two models by assessing their predictions of neural response to the actual data, we find that the STRFs obtained from natural sounds are superior. Our results show that the STRF model is an incomplete description of response properties of nonlinear auditory neurons, but that linear receptive fields are still useful models for understanding higher level sensory processing, as long as the STRFs are estimated from the responses to relevant complex stimuli.

Acoustic Stimulation

Transformations of an auditory temporal code in the medulla of a sound-producing fish.

The fish auditory system provides important insights into the evolution and mechanisms of vertebrate hearing. Fish have relatively simple auditory systems, without a cochlea for mechanical frequency analysis. However, as in all vertebrates, the primary auditory afferents of fish represent sounds as stimulus-entrained spike trains. Thus, fish provide important models for studying how temporal spiking patterns are used in higher level neural computations. In this paper we demonstrate that one of the fundamental transformations of information in the auditory system of a sound-producing fish, Pollimyrus, takes place in the auditory medulla. We discovered a class of neurons in which evoked spiking patterns were relatively independent of the stimulus fine structure and appeared to reflect intrinsic properties of the neurons. These neurons generated sustained responses but were poorly phase-locked to tones compared with the primary afferents. The interval histograms showed that spike timing was regular. However, in contrast to primary afferents, the mode of the interspike interval distribution was independent of the period of tonal stimuli. The tuning of the neurons was broad, with best sensitivity in the same spectral region where these animals concentrate energy in their communication sounds. The physiology of these neurons was similar to that of the chopper neurons known in the auditory brainstem of mammals. Our findings suggest that this medullary transformation, from phase-locked afferent input to chopper-like physiology, is basic to vertebrate auditory processing, even within lineages that have not evolved a cochlea.

Acoustic Stimulation

Dynamic sensory sensitivity and children's word decoding skills.

The relationship between sensory sensitivity and reading performance was examined to test the hypothesis that the orthographic and phonological skills engaged in visual word recognition are constrained by the ability to detect dynamic visual and auditory events. A test battery using sensory psychophysics, psychometric tests, and measures of component literacy skills was administered to 32 unselected 10-year-old primary school children. The results suggest that children's sensitivity to both dynamic auditory and visual stimuli are related to their literacy skills. Importantly, after controlling for intelligence and overall reading ability, visual motion sensitivity explained independent variance in orthographic skill but not phonological ability, and auditory FM sensitivity covaried with phonological skill but not orthographic skill. These results support the hypothesis that sensitivity at detecting dynamic stimuli influences normal children's reading skills. Vision and audition separately may affect the ability to extract orthographic and phonological information during reading.

Acoustic Stimulation