PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 7377188

Some efficiency comments on group sizes in study design.

Abstract

In study designs to compare a binary response between two groups, standard formulae to determine sample sizes are available. Frequently, one of the groups can be increased in size with little additional effort. The efficiency gain as measured by a reduction in the asymptotic variance of the logarithm of the odds ratio depends on the response probabilities and a gain cannot always be expected. However, in some cases, efficiency can be doubled by selecting one group three times the size of the other. Graphs are provided to assess the possible efficiency gain. It is seldom advantageous to select one group larger than five or six times the size of the other.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J H Lubin. 1980. Some efficiency comments on group sizes in study design.. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a112921

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Biostatistical concepts and methods in the legal setting.

Biostatistical concepts and methods apply to various problems arising in actual U.S. legal cases. These involve: measures of association, assessing the potential effect of omitted variables and the Peters-Belson approach to regression. In particular, we present the inapplicability of Fisher's exact test in the case where the process determining the marginal sample sizes is not independent of the hypothesis under study by the 2 x 2 table. We adapt Cornfield's procedure to assess whether the omission of another factor could have contributed to a non-significant finding of the effect of the major factor under investigation. Finally, we demonstrate the relevance and utility of the Peters-Belson regression methodology to equal pay and promotion cases.

Biometry