PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 7468575

Sample sizes for group sequential cohort and case-control study designs.

Abstract

This paper proposes the use of group sequential methods of calculate sample sizes for cohort and case-control study designs. The methods are based upon the theory of repeated significance tests, one of several sequential methods currently available. Group sequential methods permit repeated significance testing of relative risks obtained from periodically accumulated data while maintaining the required overall level of significance. Tables are presented for cohort and case-control studies in which the average sample size required for a group sequential design is compared to that of the conventionl fixed sample size plan for the usual constant relative risk situation. The tables show that group sequential designs are in general more efficient than fixed sample size plans for cohort and case-control studies. Computer simulations showed that group sequential methods can be employed when stratified data analyses are to be used and when the sample sizes of the two study groups are unequal.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

B S Pasternack, R E Shore. 1981. Sample sizes for group sequential cohort and case-control study designs.. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a113082

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Biostatistical concepts and methods in the legal setting.

Biostatistical concepts and methods apply to various problems arising in actual U.S. legal cases. These involve: measures of association, assessing the potential effect of omitted variables and the Peters-Belson approach to regression. In particular, we present the inapplicability of Fisher's exact test in the case where the process determining the marginal sample sizes is not independent of the hypothesis under study by the 2 x 2 table. We adapt Cornfield's procedure to assess whether the omission of another factor could have contributed to a non-significant finding of the effect of the major factor under investigation. Finally, we demonstrate the relevance and utility of the Peters-Belson regression methodology to equal pay and promotion cases.

Biometry