PubMed · 7532968
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
C Mancini. [Radon pollution].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7532968/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
The selected ion flow tube (SIFT) technique for trace gas analysis of air and breath is based on soft chemical ionisation of the trace gases to the exclusion of the major air and breath gases, in fast-flowing inert carrier gas, exploiting the ion-molecule reactions that occur between the trace gases and the pre selected precursor ions (H3O+, NO+ and O2+). The physics and ion chemistry involved in the SIFT technique are described, as are the kinetics of the ion-molecule reactions that are exploited to quantitatively analyse the trace gases. Fast on-line data-acquisition hardware and software have been developed to analyse the mass spectra obtained, from which partial pressures of the trace gases down to about 10 parts per billion can be measured. The time response of the instrument is 20 ms, allowing the profiles of the trace gas concentrations on breath to be obtained during a normal breathing cycle. Pilot results obtained with this SIFT technique include detection and quantification of the most abundant breath trace gases, analysis of cigarette smoke, detection of gases present on smokers' breath and accurate measurement of the partial pressures of NH3, NO and NO2 in air. The simultaneous analysis of several breath trace gases during a single exhalation is clearly demonstrated, and thus different elution times for isoprene and methanol along the respiratory tract are observed. This technique has great potential in many clinical and biological disciplines, and in health and safety monitoring.
The definition of tissue-air ratio (TAR) is based on the concept of primary dose. To determine TAR, both in-phantom and in-air ionization measurements are utilized. To convert ionization in the phantom into dose and that in air into primary dose, correction factors must be applied to chamber readings in both geometries. Due to difficulties in selecting proper correction factors, TAR is subject to systematic error. The error comes from two sources of uncertainty: (1) Primary dose cannot be measured. Therefore approximate methods, such as in-air ionization measurements, are used. (2) Detectors of ionization are of finite dimensions and they are inhomogeneous. In this study, analytical expression for a systematic error is derived. Because in this derivation systematic error is an accumulative error, it is no longer necessary to convert ionization, both in air and in phantom, into a dose when calculating TARs. A method of determining systematic error is described. This method is based on the ability to produce accurate zero-field data in photon beams by means of a linear extrapolation technique. Using 60Co gamma radiation in water as an example, it is shown how to generate TAR data free of systematic error. A possibility of determining TARs for therapeutic x rays is discussed.