PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 7536254

Repeat prostate needle biopsy: who needs it?

Abstract

The indications for repeat prostate needle biopsy after a transrectal ultrasound guided sextant biopsy are not defined. We examined 100 sextant prostate needle biopsies without a diagnosis of malignancy, which were repeated. Carcinoma was detected in 20 repeat biopsies (20%). Stratification based on initial biopsy result revealed carcinoma in 10 of 69 cases (14.5%) without prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia or atypia, 5 of 17 (29.4%) with atypia, 5 of 5 (100%) with grade II or III prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia and 0 of 9 with grade I prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia. Examination of prostate specific antigen (PSA) levels and PSA velocity did not provide statistically significant stratification, perhaps due to the wide variance in these parameters and the small sample size. We conclude that patients with a diagnosis of glandular atypia, or grade II or III prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia on initial biopsy are at high risk for invasive carcinoma and should undergo repeat prostate needle biopsy. A rapidly increasing serum PSA level or grossly abnormal digital rectal examination may also indicate carcinoma not discovered on initial biopsy.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

W J Ellis, M K Brawer. 1995. Repeat prostate needle biopsy: who needs it?. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7536254/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Targeting difficult accessible breast lesions: MRI-guided needle localization using a freehand technique in a 3.0 T closed bore magnet.

PURPOSE: To report the accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided needle localization for diagnosis of MRI detected suspicious breast lesions located in difficult accessible regions of the breast, using the freehand method in a 3.0 T closed bore magnet. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In five patients with five MRI-only breast lesions underwent MRI-guided needle localization for histopathologic evaluation of the lesions. All interventional procedures were performed in a 3.0 T MRI system with the patient in prone position and by using a dedicated phased array breast coil. MRI-guided needle localizations were performed by using a freehand technique. In our study, the high-resolution scan allowed preprocedural localization of all lesions without use of contrast enhancement. In all cases contrast-enhanced MRI was performed after insertion of the wire to confirm the tip of the wire in direct contact with the enhancing lesion. RESULTS: Needle localizations were performed in five patients. Histopathologic evaluation of tissue after surgery excision biopsy revealed one lymph node, three invasive ductal carcinoma and one ductal carcinoma in situ. Lesion size varied from 6 to 30 mm. Mean duration time was 25 min. No complications occurred during the intervention method. In the patient with the benign lesion control MRI of the breast after 6 months confirmed lesion removal. CONCLUSIONS: MRI-guided needle localization by using a freehand technique in a 3.0 T closed bore magnet is a safe and accurate method for diagnosis of difficult accessible breast lesions only visible on MRI.

Biopsy, Needle↗