PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 7550875

Differing porcelain systems.

Abstract

Current research in ceramics has centered on improving the strength, fit, and bondability of porcelain. Several different approaches to accomplishing these ends have led to the development of stronger cores, castable glass, computer-generated restorations, and chemically altered basic ceramics. Improvements in these basic parameters of clinical success have led to the use of all-ceramic systems such as inlays, onlays, conservative veneers, anterior and posterior crowns, and even fixed partial dentures. Porcelain veneers and full-coverage ceramic crowns have held up well clinically. Porcelain inlays and fixed partial dentures have presented problems with fit and strength, respectively, that may need correcting before they are clinically predictable in all situations. Nevertheless, it is apparent that modern dental porcelain technology has come a long way since it was originally introduced as an esthetic replacement for less cosmetic, metal-based restorations.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

D M Schneider. 1995. Differing porcelain systems.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7550875/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Three-dimensional magnetic resonance microscopy of materials.

Several aspects of magnetic resonance microscopy are examined employing three-dimensional (3D) back-projection reconstruction techniques in combination with either simple Bloch-decay methods or MREV-8 multiple-pulse line narrowing techniques in the presence of static field gradients. Applications to the areas of ceramic processing, catalyst porosity measurements and the characterization of polymeric materials are presented. The focus of the discussion centers on issues of sensitivity and resolution using this approach compared with other methods. Advantages and limitations of 3D microscopy over more commonly employed slice selection protocols are discussed, as well as potential remedies to some of the inherent limitations of the technique.

Ceramics

Ceramics: past, present, and future.

The selection and application of synthetic materials for surgical implants has been directly dependent upon the biocompatibility profiles of specific prosthetic devices. The early rationale for ceramic biomaterials was based upon the chemical and biochemical inertness (minimal bioreactivity) of elemental compounds constituted into structural forms (materials). Subsequently, mildly reactive (bioactive), and partially and fully degradable ceramics were identified for clinical uses. Structural forms have included bulk solids or particulates with and without porosities for tissue ingrowth, and more recently, coatings onto other types of biomaterial substrates. The physical shapes selected were application dependent, with advantages and disadvantages determined by: (1) the basic material and design properties of the device construct; and (2) the patient-based functional considerations. Most of the ceramics (bioceramics) selected in the 1960s and 1970s have continued over the long-term, and the science and technology for thick and thin coatings have evolved significantly over the past decade. Applications of ceramic biomaterials range from bulk (100%) ceramic structures as joint and bone replacements to fully or partially biodegradable substrates for the controlled delivery of pharmaceutical drugs, growth factors, and morphogenetically inductive substances. Because of the relatively unique properties of bioceramics, expanded uses as structural composites with other biomaterials and macromolecular biologically-derived substances are anticipated in the future.

Ceramics