PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 7598371

Head extension effect in static posturography.

Abstract

The effect of head extension on the standing position has been studied by analysis of recordings made by static posturography type III (SPGIII), a set of six test of posturography for sensory interaction. The head extension effect in posturography was evaluated by comparing the results of testing with head extension on a stable platform and on foam rubber to testing with a normal head position. In normal subjects head extension increased the postural sway, but there was no more effect on foam rubber than on the stable platform. For patients with peripheral vestibular disorders the head extension effect on the measured postural sway was evaluated by the difference from the normal condition. This difference could be positive, zero, or negative on the stable platform as well as on foam rubber. In both patients and normal subjects, foam rubber had no more effect than the stable platform. The several types of results could be seen in each category of peripheral vestibular disorders. Only minor nuances could be observed: positive differences were more pronounced in benign paroxysmal positional vertigo, whereas negative ones were more obvious in unilateral vestibular deficits. These findings, moreover, deny that head extension in SPGIII should be considered a condition revealing vestibular dysfunction, as has been supposed. As head extension has an influence on the neck proprioceptor as well as on the position of the otoliths, its effect is ambiguous, which makes the interpretation rather difficult. A neck proprioceptive as well as an otolithic explanation appears to have some clinical support.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

M E Norré. 1995. Head extension effect in static posturography.. https://doi.org/10.1177/000348949510400712

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

A comparison of radiation dose measured in CT dosimetry phantoms with calculations using EGS4 and voxel-based computational models.

CT is a high-dose examination and possibly the dominant contributor to dose from diagnostic radiology. Estimates of organ doses are obtained from Monte Carlo calculations and used to quantify radiation risk. To ensure the validity of using Monte Carlo calculations to estimate actual dose, measurements must be compared with calculations. We have measured doses to CT head and chest dosimetry phantoms and compared them with Monte Carlo (EGS4) calculated doses in voxel-based computational models of the phantoms. The simulation used an x-ray spectrum calculated from the specified values of the scanner's x-ray tube parameters. The scanner's beam-shaping filter was included in the modelling. Measured and calculated doses to both the head and chest phantoms agreed to within 7%. The inclusion of Rayleigh scattering in the calculations has a significant effect if only one slice is scanned but not if multiple slices are scanned.

Head

Three-dimensional model of the human eye-head saccadic system.

Current theories of eye-head gaze shifts deal only with one-dimensional motion, and do not touch on three-dimensional (3-D) issues such as curvature and Donders' laws. I show that recent 3-D data can be explained by a model based on ideas that are well established from one-dimensional studies, with just one new assumption: that the eye is driven toward a 3-D orientation in space that has been chosen so that Listing's law of the eye in head will hold when the eye-head movement is complete. As in previous, one-dimensional models, the eye and head are feedback-guided and the commands specifying desired eye position eye pass through a neural "saturation" so as to stay within the effective oculomotor range. The model correctly predicts the complex, 3-D trajectories of the head, eye in space, and eye in head in a variety of saccade tasks. And when it moves repeatedly to the same target, varying the contributions of eye and head, the model lands in different eye-in-space positions, but these positions differ only in their cyclotorsion about the line of sight, so they all point that line at the target-a behavior also seen in real eye-head saccades. Between movements the model obeys Listing's law of the eye in head and Donders' law of the head on torso, but during certain gaze shifts involving large torsional head movements, it shows marked, 8 degrees deviations from Listing's law. These deviations are the most important untested predictions of the theory. Their experimental refutation would sink the model, whereas confirmation would strongly support its central claim that the eye moves toward a 3-D position in space chosen to obey Listing's law and, therefore, that a Listing operator exists upstream from the eye pulse generator.

Head