PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 7620588

Infantile spasms.

Abstract

The recent intense focus of attention on further characterization and management of infantile spasms is due, in part, to the resistant nature of these seizures and the frequently poor cognitive outcome, even when the seizures are controlled. Technological advances have increased our ability to diagnose specific brain disorders associated with infantile spasms, and have led to new therapeutic approaches. Most infantile spasms previously classified as cryptogenic have now been shown to be associated with various types of brain malformations and can, therefore, be reclassified as symptomatic. Infantile spasms are probably initiated by cortical epileptic discharges which propagate to the brainstem and other subcortical areas. When the epileptogenic cortex is unilateral in an infant with resistant spasms, resective surgery may be considered. For most infants, however, surgery is not a viable option, and the search for the most effective and least toxic anticonvulsant continues.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

H T Chugani. 1995. Infantile spasms.. https://doi.org/10.1097/00019052-199504000-00010

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

A double-blind placebo-controlled trial of zonisamide (zonegran) in the treatment of essential tremor.

Medical therapy for essential tremor (ET), a common movement disorder, is often inadequate. We performed a double-blind placebo-controlled randomized trial to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of zonisamide (ZNS), an antiepileptic agent, in treating ET. Twenty patients (mean age, 60 +/- 15 years) with ET were randomized to receive ZNS or placebo. ZNS was initiated at a dosage of 100 mg/day and escalated to 200 mg/day at day 14. Patients were evaluated by accelerometry and the Fahn-Tolosa-Marin (FTM) rating scale at baseline and days 14 and 28, as well as the Clinical Global Impression (CGI-C) scale at day 28. At endpoint, subjects assigned to ZNS were taking a mean dosage of 160 +/- 50 mg/day. There were no significant improvements in the FTM total score or its subsections. Tremor amplitude as assessed by accelerometry significantly improved in the ZNS group compared to the placebo group at endpoint relative to baseline (-0.50 +/- 0.72 vs. 0.30 +/- 0.79 m/s(2); P = 0.03). On the CGI-C, 60% (n = 6) of patients in the ZNS group felt that their tremor was unchanged, while the remaining patients felt that their tremor was "minimally improved." Thirty percent (n = 3) of patients taking ZNS discontinued the study due to side effects (fatigue, headache, paresthesias) while taking 100 mg per day. ZNS did not provide significant improvements in clinical rating scales at study endpoint compared to placebo and was only modestly well tolerated. ZNS was effective in reducing tremor amplitude as measured by accelerometry.

Anticonvulsants↗