PubMed · 7644611
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
B A Buck. Farewell essentials; hello standards.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7644611/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Molecular genetics is providing the power to predict and diagnose a variety of diseases. This is an evolving field, with new information being gained at a very rapid rate. Ultimately the molecular tools should be available to prevent and/or cure a number of diseases with genetic etiology. The molecular genetics laboratory is playing a pivotal role in effecting the utilization of this technology. However, molecular genetic testing is in many ways unlike other clinical laboratory testing. The process of molecular genetic testing and counseling is complex. The laboratory offering molecular genetic testing must be able to assess pedigrees, decide the proper test to perform and provide interpretation of the tests results obtained. Although standards governing the use of high-complexity genetic tests are evolving it is clear that the laboratory offering these tests will have to have on staff personnel trained specifically in molecular genetics. The challenge will be to stay abreast of evolving technology as well as standards and recommendations governing the use of these tests. We will review the process of molecular genetic testing and the issues that must be considered by laboratories who offer these tests.
BACKGROUND: To improve employee attendance at Annual Review Day, the day when all mandatory hospitalwide education requirements are presented. The Finley Hospital (Dubuque, Iowa) initiated a performance improvement team in March 1993. Data collected previous to 1993 indicated that the compliance goal of 90% was being met only with difficulty. PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT TEAM: Data indicated three main areas where improvements could be made-communication, enforcement, and curriculum. Recommendations of task forces, with team members as leaders, were implemented. Decisions were made to change Annual Review Day to a full-day format to include all mandatory education, make outcomes competency based, and maintain cost-effectiveness. TRIAL RUN AND EVALUATION: The one-year trial run began in 1994 with gradual changes in the program from a lecture and video format to an interactive game format. For example, at one point a crossword puzzle with information on infection control and bloodborne pathogens was added. The Jeopardy Game format, used to teach the principles of emergency preparedness, was added in June 1994. Full implementation of the curriculum, communication, and enforcement recommendations have resulted in 100% compliance. MAINTAINING THE GAIN: The performance improvement team has continued to monitor results and submit quarterly reports to the quality management department. All participants must complete and pass a competency-based test on the information covered; all 760 participants have passed. The curriculum task force continues to meet on a yearly basis to evaluate the ever-evolving format, analyze attendee evaluations, and consider annual changes to the format.