PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 7666069

Discharge readiness assessment.

Abstract

Discharge planning has a long and varied history in health care delivery. As length of stay declines, the health care provider has less time to educate patients and families about home care and less time to coordinate services from home health and community agencies. As a result, many patients and families are discharged with unmet home care needs and thus are at an increased risk for complications and hospital readmissions. Readiness for discharge is one part of discharge planning and is a multifaceted, multistage concept that provides an estimate of patients' and their family members' ability to leave an acute care facility. Discharge readiness assessment is the evaluation of strengths and needs in five areas: physiologic stability, competency (cognitive and psychomotor) of the patient and family to carry out self-care management regimens, perceived self-efficacy to carry out self-care management regimens, availability of social support, and access to the health care system and community resources. Each of these areas is presented as a component of discharge readiness assessment.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

M G Titler, D M Pettit. 1995. Discharge readiness assessment.. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005082-199507000-00007

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Iron regulation.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Chronic Disease↗

The long-term effect of multidisciplinary back training: a systematic review.

STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review of randomized controlled trials. OBJECTIVES: To determine the long-term effect of multidisciplinary back training on the work participation of patients with nonspecific chronic low back pain. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Chronic low back pain is influenced by multiple factors. Multidisciplinary back training represents one of the options to take this multiplicity into account. So far, only evidence of the short-term effectiveness of this approach in terms of work participation is available. METHODS: Electronic databases were searched and the references of various articles were screened for relevant publications. Ten studies met the inclusion criteria. All included studies were evaluated for their methodologic quality. RESULTS: Five of the studies had a low methodologic quality. All high-quality studies found a positive effect on at least one of the 4 outcome measures used. Based on our criteria, effectiveness was found for the outcome measures of work participation and quality of life. No effectiveness was found for experienced pain and functional status. The intensity of the intervention seems to have no substantial influence on the effectiveness of the intervention. CONCLUSION: In the long-term, multidisciplinary back training has a positive effect on work participation in patients with nonspecific chronic low back pain.

Chronic Disease↗