PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 7674209

Dissection techniques in laparoscopic surgery: a review.

Abstract

Efficient and safe dissection in laparoscopic surgery consists of the elements of exposure, tissue stabilization and tissue division. Exposure includes bulk exposure of organs and fine exposure of tissues during dissection. In endoscopic surgery this necessarily requires meticulous haemostasis. Tissue stabilization by atraumatic means displays the tissues with appropriate lines of tension to facilitate tissue division. This can be accomplished by a variety of energy types. Besides conventional dissection techniques, technologically advanced dissection systems employing different energy types have been incorporated in laparoscopic surgery. Mechanical energy sources such as ultrasound waves and the kinetic energy of a pressurized water-jet achieve precise dissection without haemostasis. However, thermal energy sources such as high-frequency electrosurgery and lasers achieve haemostatic dissection. Thermal methods generate destructive heat in the body which leads to coagulation or separation of tissues. Surgeons have to be aware of the principles of these dissection techniques, their tissue interactions, their advantages and limitations.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

S M Shimi. 1995. Dissection techniques in laparoscopic surgery: a review.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7674209/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Objective assessment comparing hand-assisted and conventional laparoscopic surgery.

BACKGROUND: Although several reports have subjectively highlighted the benefits of hand-assisted as compared with conventional laparoscopic surgery, there has been little objective analysis comparing these two techniques. METHODS: For this study, 12 trained laparoscopic surgeons completed standardized knot-tying and dissection tasks in a laparoscopic trainer using both hand-assisted (HandPort) and traditional laparoscopic techniques. Motion analysis with the Imperial College Surgical Assessment Device was used to assess performance, measuring the number of movements made, the path length of hand travel, and the time taken. Mann-Whitney U tests were used to compare hand-assisted (HA) and conventional laparoscopic (L) performance. A p value less than 0.05 was deemed significant. Means and standard deviations are shown in the results. RESULTS: In knot tying, for both the dominant and nondominant hands, hand-assisted rather than conventional laparoscopic techniques resulted in reduced movements (dominant: HA [114 +/- 50] vs L [321 +/- 118, p < 0.001], nondominant: HA [89 +/- 36] vs L [296 +/- 96, p < 0.001]); path length (dominant: HA [1,083 +/- 680 mm] vs L [3,637 +/- 1,852 mm, p < 0.001], nondominant: HA [549 +/- 339 mm] vs L [2,556 +/- 1,042 mm, p < 0.001]); and time taken (HA [162 +/- 50 s] vs L [460 +/- 179 s, p < 0.001]). However, there was no statistical difference for any measured variable with respect to the dissection task. CONCLUSION: Hand-assisted surgery significantly improves the knot-tying ability among trained laparoscopic surgeons. However, there appears to be no improvement in performance for this specific dissection task.

Dissection↗

Rare variation in course and affluence of internal iliac vein due to its anatomical and surgical significance.

During regular dissection of the retroperitoneal region, three uncommon anatomical variations of the internal iliac veins were found on dissected specimens: in the first case, the internal iliac veins converge forming a common trunk draining into the left external iliac vein. In the other two cases, the internal iliac vein crosses the median plane and flows into the contralateral common iliac vein. These anomalies result from a persistence of the embryonic inferior branch of the cardinal vein and are important to be known for they may be undetected or may not appear in imaging. These data have implications for both pelvic surgeons and anatomists who manipulated this anatomical area.

Dissection↗