PubMed · 7695697
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
D C Whitcomb. 1994-11-10. Acetaminophen poisoning and liver function.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7695697/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
In patients suspected of having drug-induced immune thrombocytopenia, antibodies reactive with normal platelets in the presence of the suspect drug can sometimes be identified, but negative results are often obtained. One reason for this is that drug metabolites, formed in vivo, can be the sensitizing agents, but very little is known about the specific metabolites that can cause this complication. Five patients were studied who developed thrombocytopenia after taking the nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug naproxen (3 cases) or acetaminophen (2 cases) but in whom drug-dependent antibodies could not be detected by means of the unmodified drugs. In each case, antibodies that reacted with normal target platelets in the presence of a known drug metabolite (naproxen glucuronide or acetaminophen sulfate) were identified. Four of the antibodies were specific for the glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa complex, but one acetaminophen sulfate-dependent antibody reacted preferentially with GPIb/IX/V. In patients with a clinical picture suggestive of drug-induced immune thrombocytopenia, tests for metabolite-dependent antibodies can be helpful in identifying the responsible agent. (Blood. 2001;97:3846-3850)
Most chemical carcinogens require metabolic activation to electrophilic metabolites that are capable of binding to DNA and causing gene mutations. Carcinogen metabolism is carried out by large groups of xenobiotic-metabolizing enzymes that include the phase I cytochromes P450 (P450) and microsomal epoxide hydrolase, and various phase II transferase enzymes. It is extremely important to determine the role P450s play in the carcinogenesis and to establish if they are the rate limiting and critical interface between the chemical and its biological activities. The latter is essential in order to validate the use of rodent models to test safety of chemicals in humans. Since there are marked species differences in expressions and catalytic activities of the multiple P450 forms that activate carcinogens, this validation process becomes especially difficult. To address the role of P450s in whole animal carcinogenesis, mice were produced that lack the P450s known to catalyze carcinogen activation. Mouse lines having disrupted genes encoding the P450s CYP1A2, CYP2E1, and CYP1B1 were developed. Mice lacking expression of microsomal epoxide hydrolase (mEH) and NADPH-quinone oxidoreductase (NQO1) were also made. All of these mice exhibit no gross abnormal phenotypes, suggesting that the xenobiotic-metabolizing enzymes have no critical roles in mammalian development and physiological homeostasis. This explains the occurrence of polymorphisms in xenobiotic-metabolizing enzymes among humans and other mammalian species. However, these null mice do show differences in sensitivities to acute chemical toxicities, thus establishing the importance of xenobiotic metabolism in activation pathways that lead to cell death. Rodent bioassays using null mice and known genotoxic carcinogens should establish whether these enzymes are required for carcinogenesis in an intact animal model. These studies will also provide a framework for the production of transgenic mice and carcinogen bioassay protocols that may be more predictive for identifying the human carcinogens and validate the molecular epidemiological studies ongoing in humans that seek to establish a role for polymorphisms in cancer risk.
The purpose of this study was to find out whether the combination of inactive doses of paracetamol (PARA) and morphine was able to change dynorphin (DYN) A levels, evaluated by radioimmunoassay, and whether naloxone or [(-)-2-(3 furylmethyl)-normetazocine] (MR 2266), a kappa-opioid antagonist, modifies or prevents the activity of this combination on nociception and on DYN levels. The work was suggested by our previous findings which demonstrated that inactive doses of PARA and morphine, when given in combination, share an antinociceptive effect, and that PARA, at antinociceptive doses, decreases DYN levels in the frontal cortex, thus indicating a selective action within the CNS. Our present results demonstrate that the combination of inactive doses of PARA (100 mg/kg) and morphine (3 mg/kg) is just as effective in decreasing the levels of DYN A as full antinociceptive doses of PARA or morphine alone in the frontal cortex of the rat. The values, expressed in pmol/g tissue, were: control = 2.83 +/- 0.20; paracetamol (100) = 2.60 +/- 0.23; morphine (3) = 2.73 +/- 0.24; paracetamol + morphine = 1.34 + 0.16 (P < 0.05). The decrease was partially antagonised by MR 2266, but not by naloxone, suggesting that the activity of PARA and morphine in combination on DYN A levels could be mediated, at least in part, through kappa-receptors, although other systems may be involved. On the other hand, both naloxone and MR 2266 prevented the antinociceptive effect of the combination in the hot plate test. All our experimental data suggest that PARA and morphine in combination exert their antinociceptive effect through the opioidergic system, which in turn may cause a decrease in DYN levels in the CNS of the rat.