PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 7708981

Sedation for fibre optic bronchoscopy.

J H Greig·S M Cooper·H J Kasimbazi·R D Monie·A G Fennerty·B Watson
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Most current sedative regimens for fibre optic bronchoscopy use an opioid, a benzodiazepine or a combination of both. This study compares midazolam (M) (a benzodiazepine), alfentanil (A) (an opioid) and a combination of both drugs (M+A). One hundred and three patients were randomized in double-blind manner into groups M(35), A(33) and M+A(35). The number of coughs, number of additional aliquots of lignocaine and duration of the procedures were recorded along with oxygen desaturation. The patient's level of discomfort was assessed by patient and bronchoscopist and expressed as a visual analogue score. There were significantly fewer coughs per minute in Group A compared with Group M (P = 0.0053), and significantly less lignocaine was required in Group A (P = 0.005) and in Groups M+A (P < 0.002) compared with Group M. There was no significant difference in the assessment of discomfort between the groups. There was a trend for Group M+A to desaturate more than the other two with a significant difference between desaturation in Group M+A and Group A (P = 0.033). Alfentanil is a more effective anti-tussive agent than midazolam for outpatient fibre optic bronchoscopy. The combination of alfentanil and midazolam does not provide any better anti-tussive effect and may have the risk of a greater degree of desaturation secondary to increased sedation.

Explore related subjects

AlfentanilBronchoscopyProcedural SedationCoughDouble-Blind MethodDrug Therapy, CombinationFiber Optic TechnologyHumansLidocaineMidazolamClinical TrialComparative StudyJournal ArticleRandomized Controlled Trial

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J H Greig, S M Cooper, H J Kasimbazi, R D Monie, A G Fennerty, B Watson. 1995. Sedation for fibre optic bronchoscopy.. https://doi.org/10.1016/0954-6111(95)90071-3

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2006

Prevention of pain on injection of propofol: a comparison of remifentanil with alfentanil in children.

AIM: Propofol has a high incidence of pain on injection, particularly when a vein on the back of hand is used. Administration of lidocaine, either before or mixed with propofol remains the most widely used method to attenuate this pain. The use of opioids such as alfentanil and fentanyl has been found to decrease pain induced by propofol injection. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of different doses of remifentanil and alfentanil in minimizing the pain caused by propofol. METHODS: In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, healthy premedicated children between the age group of 5-12 years admitted for adenotonsillectomy were randomly allocated to one of 6 treatment groups. Group I: remifentanil 0.25 microg kg(-1); Group II: remifentanil 0.50 microg kg(-1); Group III: alfentanil 15 microg kg(-1); Group IV: alfentanil 20 microg kg(-1) 60 s prior to propofol mixed with 1 mL of 0.9% normal saline; Group V: lidocaine 1 mL of 1% (10 mg) added to 100 mg of propofol and Group VI: normal saline. During the injection of propofol (3 mg kg(-1)) pain perception was assessed with a four-point behavioural scale: none, mild, moderate, or severe. RESULTS: There were 52 subjects in Group I, 51 in Group II, 49 in Group III, 52 in Group IV, 52 in Group V and 52 in Group VI; 63.46% of patients in Group I, 39.21% in Group II, 38.77% in Group III, 36.53% in Group IV, 38.46% in Group V and 84.61% in Group VI experienced pain. Statistically, Groups II, III, IV and V were significantly better than placebo in the reduction of propofol pain (P<0.0001). Groups II, III and IV significantly reduced the pain in comparison with Group I (P<0.001). CONCLUSION: Pretreatment with intravenous remifentanil 0.5 microg kg(-1), alfentanil 15 microg kg(-1) and 20 microg kg(-1) were equally effective in reducing pain associated with propofol injection in children between the age group of 5-12 years.

Alfentanil↗
PubMed2006

Alfentanil attenuates phenylephrine-induced contraction in rat aorta.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Alfentanil was reported to relax the rat aorta by direct action on the vascular smooth muscle. The aims of this in vitro study were to examine the effect of alfentanil on phenylephrine-induced contractions in the rat aorta and to determine the cellular mechanism associated with this process. METHODS: Endothelium-denuded aortic rings were suspended in order to record isometric tension. In the rings with or without 10(-6) mol naloxone or 10(-5) mol verapamil, the concentration-response curves for phenylephrine and potassium chloride were generated in the presence or absence of alfentanil (10(-6), 5 x 10(-5), 10(-4) mol). In the rings exposed to a calcium-free isotonic depolarizing solution, the contractile response induced by the addition of calcium was assessed in the presence or absence of alfentanil (5 x 10(-5), 10(-4) mol). RESULTS: Alfentanil (5 x 10(-5), 10(-4) mol) attenuated (P < 0.05) the phenylephrine-induced contraction in the ring with or without 10(-6) mol naloxone but had no effect on the phenylephrine-induced contraction in the rings pretreated with verapamil. Alfentanil (5 x 10(-5), 10(-4) mol) produced a significant rightward shift (P < 0.01) in the potassium chloride dose-response curve, and attenuated the contractile response (P < 0.001) induced by calcium in the calcium-free isotonic depolarizing solution in a dose-dependent manner. CONCLUSIONS: A supraclinical dose of alfentanil attenuates the phenylephrine-induced contraction via an inhibitory effect on calcium influx by blocking the l-type calcium channels in the rat aortic vascular smooth muscle.

Alfentanil↗