PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 7725270

[Acute aortic dissection].

Abstract

The acute aortic dissection is a relatively rare event carrying a grave prognosis. It is the most common fatal condition involving the aorta. A high index of suspicion is mandatory because of a mortality rate of 1 to 2% per hour in the first 48 hours. A recent series from the Mayo Clinic using modern diagnostic methods showed that in 62% of the patients the initial impression of aortic dissection was correct, but in 28% this diagnosis was only made post mortem. The clinical suspicion arises from a history of sudden severe pain in the chest or the back, sometimes wandering downwards, and from certain clinical findings like aortic regurgitation, pulse deficits or neurologic manifestations such as cerebrovascular accidents or ischemic paraparesis. ST-segment elevation in the ECG is very unusual in aortic dissection and should direct the clinical focus to acute myocardial infarction. Large-bore peripheral venous access should be established, and pain control should start immediately. Hypertensive patients should be treated first with an intravenous beta-blocking agent. Vasodilators increase aortic wall stress, they should only be administered after a beta-blocking agent. Transfer to a hospital with appropriate diagnostic and surgical is mandatory.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

P Weiss. 1995. [Acute aortic dissection].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7725270/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Successful management with octreotide of a child with L-asparaginase induced hemorrhagic pancreatitis.

BACKGROUND: Octreotide is a synthetic somatostatin analogue which has been suggested for use in the management of acute pancreatitis. While studies have looked at octreotide use in the setting of pancreatitis due to chronic alcohol use or trauma, little is known of its role in management of drug induced acute pancreatitis; particularly in the pediatric setting. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We present a case of a 5 1/2-year-old white female who developed severe, necrotizing, hemorrhagic pancreatitis with pseudocyst formation secondary to L-asparaginase use as a part of her therapy for acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). She was managed initially with intravenous fluids, bowel rest, nasogastric suctioning, parenteral narcotices, and broad spectrum antibiotics. In addition, within 12 hours of admission to The Children's Hospital (TCH) in Denver, Colorado, she began therapy with octreotide (5 micrograms/kg/day IV divided b.i.d.). With this management, her pseudocyst decompressed without need for surgical intervention, her pancreatitis fully resolved, and she recovered full pancreatic function without any long-term sequelae. CONCLUSION: Use of octreotide may have served a role in limiting the severity of the disease process in this case. Further studies need to be done to verify its usefulness in this setting.

Acute Disease

Use of pamidronate in the management of acute cancer-related hypercalcemia in children.

PURPOSE: To determine whether pamidronate is a safe and effective agent for the treatment of severe hypercalcemia of malignancy in children. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of the charts of five children treated with pamidronate 1-2 mg/kg for severe, refractory hypercalcemia of malignancy. All children failed conventional therapy. Statistical analysis was done utilizing the two-tailed Student's t-test. RESULTS: All five children had complete resolution of their hypercalcemia in a predictable pattern within 24-48 hours. The average decrease in serum calcium was 1.63 mmol/L (6.54 mg/dl). (P < .01) The adverse effects were mild and transient, and consisted of hypocalcemia, hypophosphatemia, and hypomagnesemia. CONCLUSIONS: Pamidronate at a dose of 1 mg/kg is a safe and effective treatment for severe, refractory hypercalcemia of malignancy in children.

Acute Disease

Laparoscopic versus conventional appendectomy in children.

Over a period of 6 months, 48 children who underwent conventional appendectomy (CA) were compared to 34 children who had laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) for acute and recurrent subacute appendicitis. Their ages ranged from 4 to 12 years (mean 8). LA took significantly longer, 76 min, versus 50 min for CA. Less than 2 days' hospitalization was required in 95% of LA cases and 45% of CA cases. Time to return to normal activity averaged 7 days for LA and 12 days for CA (P < 0.001). Wound complications were fewer and the cosmetic appearance was most satisfactory in LA patients. LA is a safe operation that has the advantage of being exploratory, with shorter hospitalization time, early ambulation, and superior cosmetic results.

Acute Disease