PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 7738734

Pediatric appendectomy.

Abstract

PURPOSE: To define patterns of care and outcome for pediatric appendectomy. METHODS: A study was designed to evaluate all pediatric appendectomies performed in the 147 Department of Defense hospitals worldwide. Cases of nonincidental appendectomy were identified through discharge diagnoses and operative logs, and 98.6% of the charts were retrieved for review. All charts were abstracted, and data were entered into a 127-field database for analysis. RESULTS: Over a 12-month period, ending January 1993, appendectomy was performed on 1,366 pediatric patients in the Department of Defense hospital system. The patients' median age was 12 years (range, 6 months to 18 years); 59% were male. The diagnosis was normal appendix for 157 patients (12%), acute nonperforated appendicitis for 930 (68%), and perforated appendicitis for 279 (20%). Age < or = 8 years was predictive (P < .001) of a higher rate of perforated appendicitis (33% v 18%) but was not predictive of normal pathology (13% v 11%). Female gender was associated with a significantly higher rate of normal pathology (17% v 8%; P < .001) but not of perforation (18% v 22%). Temperature elevation and right lower quadrant pain and tenderness did not clinically distinguish between diagnostic groups. Sixty-two percent of patients with a normal appendix had a white blood cell count of more than 10,000/mm3, as did 91% of patients with acute or perforated appendicitis. Those with perforated appendicitis received pre- and postoperative antibiotics, primarily ampicillin/gentamicin/clindamycin or Flagyl (41%), cefoxitin (34%), or Unasyn (15%). In 77% of this subgroup, intraoperative cultures were positive, with isolates for Escherichia coli (76%) Enterococcus (30%), Bacteroides (24%), and Pseudomonas (20%) predominating. There were no deaths. Major complications occurred in 1.2% of patients with acute appendicitis and in 6.4% of those with perforated appendicitis; there were no major complications in the group with normal appendectomies. The hospitalization period was more than 7 days for 1.6%, 40%, and 3.8%, respectively. CONCLUSION: This large series, from a large number of hospitals, with multiple practitioners, can serve as a community standard for pediatric appendectomy in the 1990s.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

R H Pearl, D A Hale, M Molloy, D C Schutt, D P Jaques. 1995. Pediatric appendectomy.. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3468(95)90556-1

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Paraintestinal mesenteric abscess and chronic peritonitis in a bull.

A 2-year-old bull was examined because of intermittent anorexia, signs of mild colic, and weight loss of 3 weeks' duration. A tympanitic resonance (ping) could be heard during simultaneous auscultation and percussion of the right paralumbar fossa, and a mass could be felt in the right dorsal quadrant of the abdominal cavity during palpation per rectum. Right flank laparotomy was performed, and intraoperative ultrasonography and ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration were used to determine that the mass was an abscess. However, the abscess could not be removed or drained into the colon because of extensive adhesions to other organs. Because the owner refused to pursue continued medical treatment, the bull was euthanatized. At necropsy, the abscess was found to be connected to a caudal mesenteric lymph node through a fistula. Histologic evaluation of the lymph node revealed hyperplastic lymphadenitis, and an alpha-hemolytic streptococcus was recovered from the abscess fluid. The most likely possibility for the findings in this bull were that the lymphadenitis was of hematogenous origin and that the abscess developed as a direct extension of the infectious process, similar to development of mesenteric abscesses in horses with chronic streptococcal infection (i.e., strangles).

Abdominal Abscess

[Complications of intraperitoneal gallstones].

During laparoscopic cholecystectomy the frequency of lost stones due to torn gallbladder is from 9-40%. We have had occasion to treat three such complications: one giant right side abscess 27 months after the operation, one abscess of a port site which became a sinus with discharge of pus until complete evacuation of the stones 6 months later, and one case of dyspareunia and tenesmus cured only 33 months later by extraction of two stones from the pelvis. The first represents one case out of our first 480 laparoscopic cholecystectomies, while the other two were first operated on in another hospital. In the literature we have found 39 publications involving 53 cases. We have also noticed three medical papers written before 1987 with this type of complication, once 10 years after the initial operation. Since intraperitoneal lost gallstones have increased in frequency we expect more of these cases in the future. We conclude that it is reasonable to try to evacuate the spilled stones through laparoscopy and not to convert, except in the case of a large stone or a number of stones. Tearing of the gallbladder with lost stones must be mentioned in the protocol, so that it can be raised and included in differential diagnosis of any complications. Treatment must aim for retrieval of all stones, simple drainage being usually insufficient.

Abdominal Abscess