PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 7739272

Profiling physician practice patterns using diagnostic episode clusters.

Abstract

Health plans and providers need to profile current practice patterns to understand better the resources used in managing medical conditions. A profiling system is presented that groups International Classification of Diseases (ICD-9-CM) codes into 125 diagnostic clusters based on clinical homogeneity with respect to physician treatment response. For each diagnostic cluster, diagnostic episode clusters (DECs) are formulated. A DEC links all services incurred in treating a patient's medical condition within a specific period of time. Each DEC is marked with a severity-of-illness, comorbidity, and age indicator. To test the validity of the diagnostic cluster methodology, claims were analyzed from a preferred provider organization (PPO) and an independent practice association (IPA). PPO and IPA DEC charges and utilization were compared with t-tests. Physician practice patterns differed based on patient severity of illness, comorbidities, and age. Both PPO and IPA physicians delivered significantly more resources to patients in higher severity-of-illness categories. PPO physicians generally treated older patients with more resources than younger patients. Patient age did not have the same impact on IPA physicians' practice patterns. IPA physicians' average treatment pattern was about 22% less expensive than that of PPO physicians. IPA physicians decreased average expenses by reducing hospital days by about 73% (P < 0.01) and hospital outpatient visits by about 89% (P < 0.01) compared to the rates of PPO physicians. Ambulatory services among IPA physicians were not significantly higher than rates for PPO physicians. The DEC methodology is a valid approach for profiling patterns of treatment. The style of medicine in the IPA was less hospital intensive and, consequently, less expensive than that practiced by PPO physicians. PPO physicians also had greater practice pattern variations than IPA physicians.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

D G Cave. 1995. Profiling physician practice patterns using diagnostic episode clusters.. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005650-199505000-00003

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Clustering individuals using INMTD: a novel versatile multi-view embedding framework integrating omics and imaging data.

MOTIVATION: Combining omics and images can lead to a more comprehensive clustering of individuals than classic single-view approaches. Among the various approaches for multi-view clustering, nonnegative matrix tri-factorization (NMTF) and nonnegative Tucker decomposition (NTD) are advantageous in learning low-rank embeddings with promising interpretability. Besides, there is a need to handle unwanted drivers of clusterings (i.e. confounders). RESULTS: In this work, we introduce a novel multi-view clustering method based on NMTF and NTD, named INMTD, which integrates omics and 3D imaging data to derive unconfounded subgroups of individuals. According to the adjusted Rand index, INMTD outperformed other clustering methods on a synthetic dataset with known clusters. In the application to real-life facial-genomic data, INMTD generated biologically relevant embeddings for individuals, genetics, and facial morphology. By removing confounded embedding vectors, we derived an unconfounded clustering with better internal and external quality; the genetic and facial annotations of each derived subgroup highlighted distinctive characteristics. In conclusion, INMTD can effectively integrate omics data and 3D images for unconfounded clustering with biologically meaningful interpretation. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: INMTD is freely available at https://github.com/ZuqiLi/INMTD.

Cluster Analysis↗

Relative efficiency of unequal versus equal cluster sizes in cluster randomized and multicentre trials.

Cluster randomized and multicentre trials evaluate the effect of a treatment on persons nested within clusters, for instance, patients within clinics or pupils within schools. Optimal sample sizes at the cluster (centre) and person level have been derived under the restrictive assumption of equal sample sizes per cluster. This paper addresses the relative efficiency of unequal versus equal cluster sizes in case of cluster randomization and person randomization within clusters. Starting from maximum likelihood parameter estimation, the relative efficiency is investigated numerically for a range of cluster size distributions. An approximate formula is presented for computing the relative efficiency as a function of the mean and variance of cluster size and the intraclass correlation, which can be used for adjusting the sample size. The accuracy of this formula is checked against the numerical results and found to be quite good. It is concluded that the loss of efficiency due to variation of cluster sizes rarely exceeds 10 per cent and can be compensated by sampling 11 per cent more clusters.

Cluster Analysis↗

A spatial scan statistic for ordinal data.

Spatial scan statistics are widely used for count data to detect geographical disease clusters of high or low incidence, mortality or prevalence and to evaluate their statistical significance. Some data are ordinal or continuous in nature, however, so that it is necessary to dichotomize the data to use a traditional scan statistic for count data. There is then a loss of information and the choice of cut-off point is often arbitrary. In this paper, we propose a spatial scan statistic for ordinal data, which allows us to analyse such data incorporating the ordinal structure without making any further assumptions. The test statistic is based on a likelihood ratio test and evaluated using Monte Carlo hypothesis testing. The proposed method is illustrated using prostate cancer grade and stage data from the Maryland Cancer Registry. The statistical power, sensitivity and positive predicted value of the test are examined through a simulation study.

Cluster Analysis↗