PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 7745472

NCLEX job analysis study: questionnaire development.

Abstract

Job analysis studies have become pervasive in professional and occupational licensure. The intent of the National Council's job analysis studies are consistent with the Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing (American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education, 1985), which state that "Job Analyses provide the primary basis for defining content domain." It is an appropriate methodology to validate licensure examinations. A job analysis study must delineate the content domain in order to measure critical skills and knowledge needed for safe practice. The adequacy of a job analysis study is critically dependent on the data collection instrument. This article describes the systematic process used by one national organization to develop a job analysis data collection instrument in order to ensure the integrity, validity, and defensibility of its examination.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

N L Chornick, C J Yocom. 1995. NCLEX job analysis study: questionnaire development.. https://doi.org/10.3928/0148-4834-19950301-04

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Medical heuristics: the silent adjudicators of clinical practice.

Robust scientific conclusions are too sparse to inform fully most of the choices that physicians must make about tests and treatments. Instead, ad hoc rules of thumb, or "heuristics," must guide them, and many of these are problematic. Physicians extrapolate from the small samples studied by clinical trials to general populations, but they do so inconsistently. Many physicians live by rules that dictate "not treating the numbers," correcting abnormalities slowly, achieving diagnostic certainty, and operating now to avoid "greater" risk in the future. Yet in each case, historical trends or statistical realities suggest either doing the opposite or investing in more discriminating heuristics. The heuristics of medicine should be discussed, criticized, refined, and then taught. More uniform use of explicit and better heuristics could lead to less practice variation and more efficient medical care.

Clinical Competence