PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 7752046

Difficulties in symptom recognition in infants.

J Selekman·E Malloy
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The subject of symptom recognition in infants is just beginning to be explored in nursing literature; the process may be more difficult that it originally appears. Because symptoms are subjective and their identification is dependent on communication between the client and the nurse or caretaker, it becomes important to assist nurses, parents, and other health care providers in this process. This article discusses the impact of cues, developmental aspects, and inferences as they influence the identification of symptoms experienced by infants.

Explore related subjects

CuesDiagnosis, DifferentialHumansInfantInfant, NewbornNonverbal CommunicationPainPediatric NursingJournal ArticleReview

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J Selekman, E Malloy. 1995. Difficulties in symptom recognition in infants.. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0882-5963(05)80003-x

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2007

Rhythmic alternation and the optional complementiser in English: new evidence of phonological influence on grammatical encoding.

In a recall-based spoken production experiment, native English-speaking participants' variable use of the complementiser that to introduce the sentential complement in sentences like Henry knew (that) Lucy/Louise washed the dishes was found to be related to whether that inclusion/omission resulted in an alternating sequence of stressed and unstressed syllables between the verb of the main clause and the subject of the complement clause. This finding is discussed in relation to the question of whether and how phonological encoding can influence grammatical encoding in spoken language production.

Cues↗
PubMed2007

Reversing the truth effect: learning the interpretation of processing fluency in judgments of truth.

Repeated statements receive higher truth ratings than new statements. Given that repetition leads to greater experienced processing fluency, the author proposes that fluency is used in truth judgments according to its ecological validity. Thus, the truth effect occurs because people learn that fluency and truth tend to be positively correlated. Three experiments tested this notion. Experiment 1 replicated the truth effect by directly manipulating processing fluency; Experiment 2 reversed the effect by manipulating the correlation between fluency and truth in a learning phase. Experiment 3 generalized this reversal by showing a transfer of a negative correlation between perceptual fluency (due to color contrast) and truth to truth judgments when fluency is due to prior exposure (i.e., repetition).

Cues↗