[Reflux esophagitis].

C A Salas Coll

PubMed · 7768423

[Reflux esophagitis].

Abstract

Chronic Esophageal reflux induces reflux esophagitis, which is a common finding in gastroenterological practice. Reflux esophagitis produce symptoms like pirosis, regurgitation and in some cases respiratory complains resembling asthma or angina-like chest pain. The pathophysiology of this disease is based on a multifactorial origin, which usually results in the chronic evolution of the disease. In recent years, there have appeared new evidences pointing out to alterations in the relaxing mechanisms of the lower esophageal sphincter; however, some patients having reflux esophagitis show normal shincteric pressure. The sweep action of esophageal smooth muscle is a key point for sending back to stomach the eventually refluxed material; it has been demonstrated that this sweeping action is impaired in many patients having reflux esophagitis. Incompetence of lower esophageal sphincter seems to be related a local to neural alteration rather than to smooth muscle functional disturbance. Recent findings stablis a link between local nitric oxide release and relaxation of the lower esophageal sphincter. Esophageal mucosaldisplay an intrinsic resistance to HCL, pepsin, bilis and enzymes deleterious action by a blockade of back-defusion of hydrogen ions contained in the refluxed material. Nevertheless, some other luminal and non-luminal factors are involved in this mucosalprotection. When these intrinsic resistance factors are abated, tisular lesions like ersion, ulcer and Barret's mucosal changes can occur; is of particular interest because its potential malignant evolution. Esophageal reflux usually resolves with medical treatmen, but in some particular cases surgical correction is indicated for improving the antireflux barrier.

Explore related subjects

Esophagitis, Peptic Esophagoscopy Humans Manometry English Abstract Journal Article Review

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

C A Salas Coll. [Reflux esophagitis].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7768423/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2006

Prediction of recurrence after laparoscopic fundoplication for erosive reflux esophagitis based on anatomy-function-pathology (AFP) classification.

BACKGROUND: The usefulness of the anatomy-function-pathology (AFP) score was examined to evaluate its prediction of recurrence after laparoscopic fundoplication for erosive reflux esophagitis. METHODS: Of the patients undergoing laparoscopic fundoplication for erosive reflux esophagitis of Los Angeles classification grade A or higher from December 1994 to December 2004, 107 who underwent preoperative barium esophagogram, pH monitoring, and endoscopy were selected as subjects. The AFP score was calculated by A, F, and P factor grades of the AFP classification. By comparing patients with and without recurrence, the usefulness of the AFP score for predicting recurrence was examined. RESULTS: Reflux esophagitis recurred in seven patients. No significant difference in age, sex, or A or F factor was observed between the groups, whereas a significant difference was observed in the P factor (p = 0.008). On the other hand, the mean AFP score in the recurrence group was 16.9 +/- 5.3, whereas that in the nonrecurrence group was 8.9 +/- 5.3 (p = 0.0021). Among the patients with a score of 17 points or more (n = 23), recurrence was found in 6 patients (26%). On the other hand, among the patients with a score lower than 17 points (n = 84), recurrence was found in 1 patient, but not in the remaining 83 patients (1%). Sensitivity was thus 85.7% (95% confidence interval [CI], 42.1-99.6), and specificity was 83% (95% CI, 74.2-89.8). The positive predictive value was 26.1% (95% CI, 10.2-48.4), and the negative predictive value was 98.8% (95% CI, 93.5-99.9). Multiple logistic regression analysis was performed, and receiver operating characteristics curves were obtained. The area under the curve for the AFP score was 0.8457, whereas that for the P factor was 0.7907 (p = 0.0045), suggesting that the AFP score may more accurately predict recurrence than the P factor. CONCLUSION: The AFP score may be useful for predicting postoperative recurrence. If surgery is performed when the AFP score is lower than 17 points, the likelihood of postoperative recurrence is expected to be very low.

Esophagitis, Peptic↗

PubMed2006

Time trends of gastroesophageal reflux disease: a systematic review.

There is a perception that the prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is increasing, but few studies have directly tackled this issue. By using a systematic approach, this review aimed to assess objectively whether the prevalence of GERD is changing with time. First, population-based studies that reported the prevalence of at least weekly heartburn and/or acid regurgitation were subjected to a time-trend analysis with a Poisson regression model. Second, population-based studies reporting the prevalence of GERD symptoms at 2 time points in the same source population were reviewed. Third, longitudinal studies that charted the prevalence of GERD symptoms and esophagitis in primary and secondary care were examined. The Poisson model revealed a significant (P < .0001) trend for an increase in the prevalence of reflux symptoms in the general population over time. Separately, significant increases with time were found for North America (P = .0005) and Europe (P < .0001) but not Asia (P = .49). Studies of the same source population over time indicated an increase in the prevalence of GERD in the U.S., Singapore, and China but not Sweden. An increase in the prevalence of GERD or esophagitis was found in the majority of longitudinal studies. There is evidence that the prevalence of GERD has increased during the past 2 decades. If this trend continues, it could contribute to the rapidly increasing incidence of more serious complications associated with GERD, such as esophageal adenocarcinoma, as well as costs to healthcare systems and employers.

Esophagitis, Peptic↗

PubMed2006

[Relationship between the size of hiatal hernia and esophageal acid exposure time in erosive and non-erosive reflux disease].

BACKGROUND: In the last few years studies have demonstrated that hiatal hernias have an important role in the pathogenesis of reflux disease, promoting reflux by many different mechanisms, emphasizing that the larger the hiatal hernia, the higher the reflux intensity and erosive esophagitis prevalence. AIM: To correlate the size of hiatal hernias (small or large) with reflux intensity (measured by pH monitoring parameters) in patients with non-erosive and erosive reflux disease. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We reviewed pH monitoring from patients with typical reflux symptoms (heartburn) previously submitted to upper endoscopy. Reflux intensity was measured by the % of total time of pH < 4 (%TT) and by % of time of pH < 4 in upright (%UT) and supine (%ST) positions. Patients were classified as non-erosive reflux disease if no erosive esophagitis was found in endoscopy and pH monitoring was abnormal and as erosive reflux disease if they had erosive esophagitis. Hiatal hernias were classified as small if their size ranged from 2 to 4 cm and large if > or = 5 cm. RESULTS: A total of 192 patients were included, being 115 in erosive reflux disease group and 77 in non-erosive reflux disease group. In erosive reflux disease patients, there were 94 (81%) with small hiatal hernias and 21 (19%) with large ones and in non-erosive reflux disease patients there were 66 (85%) with small and 11(15%) with large hiatal hernias. In erosive reflux disease group, the %TT, %UT and %ST were of 13.1 +/- 7.1; 13.4 +/- 7.4 and 12.3 +/- 11.5 in small hiatal hernias and 20.2 +/- 12.3; 17.8 +/- 14.1 and 20.7 +/- 14.1 in large hiatal hernias, respectively (P < 0.05 for %TT and %TS). In non-erosive reflux disease patients, %TT, %UT and %ST were 9.6 +/- 4.8; 10.8 +/- 6.8 and 8.6 +/- 7.3 in small hiatal hernias and of 14.6 +/- 13.3; 11.2 +/- 7.5 and 18.1 +/- 21.0 in large hiatal hernias respectively (P < 0.05 for %TT and %TS). CONCLUSION: Large hiatal hernias increase acid exposure time only in supine position in erosive esophagitis patients and in non-erosive patients.

Esophagitis, Peptic↗