PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 7817957

Direct light transmittance through ceramic brackets.

T Eliades·W M Johnston·G Eliades
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The objective of this study was to investigate the degree of direct light transmittance (%T) of various types of esthetic brackets and to correlate these values with their structure, morphologic factors, and composition. Eight types of brackets were used in the study; six brackets of each type were tested. An ultraviolet-visible spectroscopic direct transmission analysis was performed at 320 to 700 nm wavelength range. From each spectrum, the %T corresponded to the peak absorbance wavelength of the photoinitiator of the polymerization was recorded (468 nm). Recorded data were analyzed with one-way analysis of variance and Scheffe's test at alpha = 0.05 significance level. In addition, scanning electron microscope (SEM) images were used to reveal the structure and morphologic factors of the brackets tested. Highest %T values (Mean +/- 1 SD) were obtained from a monocrystal type of bracket (Starfire ["A" Company, San Diego, Calif.] 35.02 +/- 1.59%), followed by a polycrystalline (Fascination [Dentaurum, Pforzhein, Germany] 5.70 +/- 1.41%) and a ceramic/polycarbonate base one (Ceramaflex [TP Orthodontics, Inc., La Porte, Ind.] 4.02 +/- 0.96%). Also other brands presented the following data: Allure (GAC, Central Islip, N.Y.) 3.62 +/- 0.5%; Transcend 2000 (Unitek/3M, Monrovia, Calif.) 2.62 +/- 0.5%; Fascination (edgewise) (Dentaurum, Pforzhein, Germany) 1.97 +/- 0.69%; Lumina (Ormco, Glendora, Calif.) 1.57 +/- 0.5%; Signature (RMO, Denver, Colo.) 1.22 +/- 0.5%. The results showed that the structure, morphologic factors, and composition of the brackets tested were found to affect direct light transmission significantly.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Explore related subjects

Aluminum OxideAnalysis of VarianceCeramicsComposite ResinsDental BondingDental CementsElectron Probe MicroanalysisHumansLightMaterials TestingMolecular StructureOrthodontic BracketsPolycarboxylate CementSpectrophotometrySpectrophotometry, UltravioletTensile StrengthComparative StudyJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

T Eliades, W M Johnston, G Eliades. 1995. Direct light transmittance through ceramic brackets.. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0889-5406(95)70152-4

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2007

Initial osteoblast-like cell response to pure titanium and zirconia/alumina ceramics.

OBJECTIVES: Outstanding mechanical properties, resistance to scratching and high biocompatibility make zirconia/alumina ceramics interesting for dental applications. To solve the problem of the well-known low temperature degradation and to provide stable mechanical properties a novel zirconia alloy ((Y,Nb)-TZP/alumina) was developed. The aim of this study was to investigate the initial bone cell response to this new zirconia/alumina composite ceramic. METHODS: HOS cells were cultured on zirconia/alumina composite (Zc) and pure titanium (Ti) discs. Surface topography was examined by atomic force microscopy (AFM), cell morphology by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Cell proliferation (MTS) and alkaline phosphatase activity was measured at 1, 4 and 8 days. The mRNA expression of Cycline D1, the cell cycle regulating gene, integrin beta 1, osteonectin (ON) and beta-actin were evaluated by RT-PCR analysis after 12, 24 and 48 h. RESULTS: Both substrates showed a very smooth character with R(a)-values in the range of 0.002-0.113 microm supporting a continuous cellular growth. After 8 days, cell proliferation on Zc was higher than on Ti. The mRNA expression of cyclin D1 showed similar activity after 48 h on both surfaces, ALP activity was higher on Zc after 8 days. ON expression however showed no difference between the two groups. SIGNIFICANCE: Our data demonstrate that this new zirconia composite ceramic showed at least equivalent or slightly better biological response of osteoblast-like HOS cells than pure titanium during a short-time cell culture period.

Aluminum Oxide↗
PubMed2007

Lifetime of alumina- and zirconia ceramics used for crown and bridge restorations.

The lifetime of a ceramic is dependent on the presence of incidental cracks and their gradual propagation under the conditions of the oral cavity. The objective of this study was to examine the long-term strength of glass-infiltrated alumina- and various zirconia ceramics currently used in CAD/CAM systems to manufacture crown and bridge frameworks. Fracture mechanics were applied to determine characteristic strength (sigma(omicron)), Weibull modulus (m), fracture toughness (K(Ic)), and the subcritical crack growth parameters n and B. Based on these parameters, lifetime diagrams were generated which allowed the evaluation of the long-term behavior. The results showed that in a moist environment, the glass-infiltrated alumina- and some zirconia ceramics have a high susceptibility to subcritical crack growth. Zirconia ceramics with an alumina oxide content of 0.25 wt %, however, exhibited the highest initial and most favorable long-term strength, and should therefore be suitable for crown and bridge restorations.

Aluminum Oxide↗
PubMed2007

Role of core support material in veneer failure of brittle layer structures.

A study is made of veneer failure by cracking in all-ceramic crown-like layer structures. Model trilayers consisting of a 1 mm thick external glass layer (veneer) joined to a 0.5 mm thick inner stiff and hard ceramic support layer (core) by epoxy bonding or by fusion are fabricated for testing. The resulting bilayers are then glued to a thick compliant polycarbonate slab to simulate a dentin base. The specimens are subjected to cyclic contact (occlusal) loading with spherical indenters in an aqueous environment. Video cameras are used to record the fracture evolution in the transparent glass layer in situ during testing. The dominant failure mode is cone cracking in the glass veneer by traditional outer (Hertzian) cone cracks at higher contact loads and by inner (hydraulically pumped) cone cracks at lower loads. Failure is deemed to occur when one of these cracks reaches the veneer/core interface. The advantages and disadvantages of the alumina and zirconia core materials are discussed in terms of mechanical properties-strength and toughness, as well as stiffness. Consideration is also given to the roles of interface strength and residual thermal expansion mismatch stresses in relation to the different joining methods.

Aluminum Oxide↗